User talk:Me: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Blocked: decline unblock
Line 12: Line 12:
:If you wish to contest this block, you may use <nowiki>{{unblock|</nowiki><i><nowiki>reason</nowiki></i>}}, although I strongly suggest you don't. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
:If you wish to contest this block, you may use <nowiki>{{unblock|</nowiki><i><nowiki>reason</nowiki></i>}}, although I strongly suggest you don't. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|1=Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits.|decline=[[WP:NPA|Personal attacks]], [[WP:AGF|failure to assume good faith]] and [[WP:NOTTHEM|not addressing your own behavior]]. You stay blocked. — [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 05:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits.|decline=[[WP:NPA|Personal attacks]], [[WP:AGF|failure to assume good faith]] and [[WP:NOTTHEM|not addressing your own behavior]]. You stay blocked. — [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 05:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)}}
:{{unblock|My own behavior didn't warrant the blocking in the first place, hence why I did not address it. Your friend and mine, Rschen, decided to poke his nose into a discussion where it didn't belong, and when someone else came along and agreed with me, he decided to have me blocked. Can't see where he assumed good faith, can you?}}

Revision as of 05:23, 4 January 2009

Template:Archive box collapsible

Protection

I've fully protected your userpage. If you're willing to stop adding the category, drop me a line and I'll remove the protection. EVula // talk // // 23:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for disruption. It says at WP:TWINKLE that this is to be used within policy. I don't see leaving false "AGF" messages as being in policy. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to contest this block, you may use {{unblock|reason}}, although I strongly suggest you don't. neuro(talk) 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Me (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Because rschen7754 has his gonads in a bunch and can't take a joke - specifically when the joke has absolutely nothing to do with him and he should just mind his own business. He is abusing his power and wasting everyone's time dealing with someone just messing around when a real admin should be able to tell the difference between harmless teasing and malicious edits.

Decline reason:

Personal attacks, failure to assume good faith and not addressing your own behavior. You stay blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Me (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My own behavior didn't warrant the blocking in the first place, hence why I did not address it. Your friend and mine, Rschen, decided to poke his nose into a discussion where it didn't belong, and when someone else came along and agreed with me, he decided to have me blocked. Can't see where he assumed good faith, can you?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My own behavior didn't warrant the blocking in the first place, hence why I did not address it. Your friend and mine, Rschen, decided to poke his nose into a discussion where it didn't belong, and when someone else came along and agreed with me, he decided to have me blocked. Can't see where he assumed good faith, can you? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My own behavior didn't warrant the blocking in the first place, hence why I did not address it. Your friend and mine, Rschen, decided to poke his nose into a discussion where it didn't belong, and when someone else came along and agreed with me, he decided to have me blocked. Can't see where he assumed good faith, can you? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My own behavior didn't warrant the blocking in the first place, hence why I did not address it. Your friend and mine, Rschen, decided to poke his nose into a discussion where it didn't belong, and when someone else came along and agreed with me, he decided to have me blocked. Can't see where he assumed good faith, can you? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}