User talk:Myles325a: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:52, 21 April 2011

August 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Talk:Newcastle High School (Australia). Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For more information on the purpose of talk pages, see Help:Using talk pages and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your advice followed

Category:All pages needing cleanup Rich Farmbrough, 21:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Unblocked

Sorry for the delay in unblocking you. I've removed the sockpuppet template from your userpage, and restored it to its original state. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, the block on your network range should have expired by now, so I've removed your IP Block Exemption. Should you encounter any problems editing, please email me or post an unblock request. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:24, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

toolserver

http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pcount/index.php?name=Myles325a&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia

Talkback

Hello, Myles325a. You have new messages at Bongomatic's talk page.
Message added 07:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hold on there

The insulting message you left on User talk:78.38.28.3 is noted. You risk being blocked from editing if you continue with such behaviour. You could apologise on his talk page, or remove your comments. Moriori (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your further edits to that page are noted. I have left a message about your behaviour at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Can someone take a look please?. Moriori (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wit

I thought you might appreciate this. I like to watch this page. Malleus has a finely tuned bullshit meter. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And that page brought me to this one! I wish I could pull off what you did! Outstanding!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to KenKen. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 04:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on KenKen. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ^Bongo_matic 04:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removal from RD/S

I have removed something you posted to the Science refdesk, because I felt that it was unproductive. If you wish to discuss this, please use the relevant Talk page where I've started a section for it. -- Scray (talk) 03:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this too from the same section:

"How jolly nice for you. Now if you can just clear up some of those shameful slums, you'll be all set to join the 20th Century. (P.S. Printing in full caps is regarded as a style best suited for the uneducated and uncouth. Then again, perhaps you better keep on using it.) Myles325a (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)"[reply]

Per WT:RD. Please do not bite our Reference Desk visitors. Thank you, WikiDao ☯ 12:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate discussions at the ref desks

Please don't keep reposting closed discussions at the reference desks. Wikipedia is not the appropriate place for us to wildly speculate about the living conditions of your fantasy world. It has nothing to do with being "scientific" or not; no one used that rationale in objecting to your discussion. The reference desks are just not the appropriate venue for such discussions. They exist so people can ask questions which others can answer using references, usually from Wikipedia articles. What you basically did was post a giant wall of text describing your "82% Better Earth", and then asked for an open discussion regarding it. That simply isn't appropriate. --Jayron32 05:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with what others have said about this 06:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:13, 21 April 2011 edit Jayron32 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 105,509 edits →‎Inappropriate discussions at the ref desks: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:52, 21 April 2011 edit undo Nil Einne (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 71,773 edits →‎Inappropriate discussions at the ref desks Next edit →
Line 59:		Line 59:

	Please don't keep reposting closed discussions at the reference desks. Wikipedia is not the appropriate place for us to wildly speculate about the living conditions of your fantasy world. It has nothing to do with being "scientific" or not; no one used that rationale in objecting to your discussion. The reference desks are just not the appropriate venue for such discussions. They exist so people can ask questions which others can answer using references, usually from Wikipedia articles. What you basically did was post a giant wall of text describing your "82% Better Earth", and then asked for an open discussion regarding it. That simply isn't appropriate. --[[User:Jayron32\|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32\|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 05:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)		Please don't keep reposting closed discussions at the reference desks. Wikipedia is not the appropriate place for us to wildly speculate about the living conditions of your fantasy world. It has nothing to do with being "scientific" or not; no one used that rationale in objecting to your discussion. The reference desks are just not the appropriate venue for such discussions. They exist so people can ask questions which others can answer using references, usually from Wikipedia articles. What you basically did was post a giant wall of text describing your "82% Better Earth", and then asked for an open discussion regarding it. That simply isn't appropriate. --[[User:Jayron32\|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32\|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 05:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
			:Concur with what others have said about this 06:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)