User talk:Number 57

Click here to leave a new message.

Archives
Archive 1 (Dec 2006 - Nov 2007) Archive 2 (Nov 2007 - Jul 2008) Archive 3 (Jul 2008 - Jun 2009) Archive 4 (Jun 2008 - )

Suffolk Villages

Thankyou for all the effort you're putting into creating articles about villages in Suffolk. You may not know but there is a wikiproject Wikipedia:WikiProject Suffolk and Essex which is dedicated to help improve these articles. Thankyou, Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs favourite 07:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Guinean presidential election, 1982

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Guinean presidential election, 1982, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.wikiwak.com/texis/wcolz?red=1&q=Guinean+presidential+election%2C+1982.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

African elections

Hello, Number 57. You have new messages at Soman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Soman (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Irish general election, 2011

User talk:Snappy has repeatedly ([1][2]) added back the same info. despite no discussion on Talk:Irish general election, 2011. A previous editor started a conversation on this a few days ago, then it was apparently added back without mention or even an attempt to discuss, then i removed it again, he added it back, i left a message on talk, and he reverted again. The supposed point to the talk facility is to avoid edit wars. Can you warn him/revert back to standing consensus (at least for now), i would be near 3RR if i did so.Lihaas (talk) 22:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Alberto Ohaco

Could you have a look into this for me please and make sure that something gets done about it. I don't do much around here anymore and that kind of thing is the reason why. Could you ensure that the Alberto Ohaco article is restored, or failing that let me have a copy of the text so I can host it elsewhere? It certainly was not a copyvio when I wrote it, I did all of the painstaking research myself. Perhaps someone else added copyvio material later on or the deleting admin got confused by a mirror site, I don't know. I just think that a knee jerk deletion without even bothering to notify the established author who wrote the thing is damaging to the project. Well it is if you attach any value to my contributions over the years and consider the fact that I have gone from 50-100 article creations a month down to 1 creation in the last six months because of crap like this. Many thanks mate King of the North East 22:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

For you

Always a pleasure seeing something of yours appear in the newpage queue. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure. And who knows? The way Google Books is going, we may have something to work with in another five years or so. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Guinean constitutional referendum, 1958

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Liberian general election, 1927

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Kosovar

in reaction to the previous comment you made at Talk:Kosovan parliamentary election, 2010 i just found Kosovar which contradicts.Lihaas (talk) 22:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay, it just seemed conflicting although i since edited that reflect what you said on the talk page.Lihaas (talk) 10:11, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

page move

can you move Sports diplomacy to Politics and sports per Talk:Sports_diplomacy#Merger_proposal? I would do it but then it would copy+paste and the histories wouldnt move.(Lihaas (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)).

Israel

i belive your from israel, hence i presume familar with that page here. Ive posted a tag and discussion there and no one seems to answer, so what is a reasonable time to go ahead with the split because the page is way too long and takes an eternity to load?(Lihaas (talk) 10:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)).

The main page Israel(Lihaas (talk) 11:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)).

some split off section to decrease and summarise with requsite pages were suggested. we can discuss there?(Lihaas (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)).

bahrain

i also readded the infobox to the election page as its over now, (and i moved the politics banner that was disrupting the pae) but its not working. Can you review it whenever you have time?(Lihaas (talk) 18:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)).

Islamization

can we move this per Talk:Islamization#page_move. pretty obvious that is doesnt petain to teh USA.(Lihaas (talk) 07:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)).

Kosovar elections

you deleted a used template Template:Kosovan_local_elections and left a mess. The location elections are now lacking any information on the kosovar elections. can you please clean up the mess you made? thanks James Michael DuPont (talk) 11:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

3O

Can you give your opinion on this discussion Talk:Irish_general_election,_2011#Edits_explained. We seem to have to come to agreement on all but 1 issue at the moment and a tie breaker will be appreciated.(Lihaas (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)).

No, I refuse to accept Number57's input. I had dealing with them before and believe they are biased against me. Snappy (talk) 20:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I've replied on my talk page to your last comment. Snappy (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Membership of the English non-league football project?

Thanks for your reply at WPF. I appreciate you corrected things up, and added yourself to the WPF member table. Just want to bump you a friendly short notice, that you forgot to also add your name to the local member list at the English non-league football project. The taskforce coloumn at the WPF member list is only supposed to show those memberships, who have been confirmed with an additional subscription at the local website of the taskforce. So you now also need to confirm your taskforce membership, by also adding your name at the English non-league football project. Kind regards, --Danish Expert (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Hyperzionism

In 2008, you proposed this article for deletion. The prod was contested, but I agree the subject is non-notable, and have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperzionism. Robofish (talk) 03:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Cork City F.C.

Hi, would you be able to lend some support to merge the Cork City FORAS Co-op article with the Cork City F.C. article please?

The 2011 fixture list released by the FAI calls the club Cork City: http://www.airtricityleague.ie/images/stories/2011_Season_Airtricity_League_Fixture_List.pdf

The new crest, as can be seen in this article, shows "Cork City Football Club" and "1984".

It has already been shown on the official club website back in June and a solicitors website that everything good from the previous holding company is now owned by the supporters' trust FORAS: http://www.corkcityfc.net/home/2010/06/01/its-in-the-right-hands/ and http://www.ohod.ie/index.php/news

The discussion on the merge is at Talk:Cork City F.C. Hsetne (talk) 13:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

The articles have been merged. I'm not sure if you had anything to do with it, but thanks anyway. Hsetne (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eritrean elections

Template:Eritrean elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Liechtenstein women's suffrage referendum, 1984

The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

deelte redirects

another user (and then me) created the page Tunisian general election, 2014 and Tunisian general election, 2011 can we delete it as there already is a page correctly made just today at Tunisian parliamentary election, 2011?(Lihaas (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)).

review my edit in Minorities Minister of Israel

Since it was nullified in 1949, it was not an independent office, but rather a ministration responsiblity under a Minister without portfolio - so reads the Hebrew wikipedia, and its list of ministers (see my edit), and not the way it was previously put in the article. I think there is a need for a source fpr that. my source was Hebrew wikipedia. --93.172.160.96 (talk) 16:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Independence

Yeah actually I agree! haha I started thinking about that it should be Independence, based on the news reports highlighting it as Independence. I was going to move it myself to Israeli Independence Party or Independence Party (Israel), but have been sick the past few days. So no problem really. I would prefer one of those two names to that clunky one atm. And yes a merge would be good. Thats it I think? :) --Metallurgist (talk) 23:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

No complaints from me on that name.--Metallurgist (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

wikiproject israel

are you on that wikiproject? because its highly biased right now to ashekanazi jewry. the shephardic article is baraely built at all. I would start working on it but id be biased to the india connection and we dont want UNDUE wegiht to the rest of the (arab/iranian) world.(Lihaas (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).

duplicate Misrad Ha-penim

Internal Affairs Minister of Israel (שר הפנים, Sar Ha-penim)

Ministry of Interior (Israel) (משרד הפנים, Misrad Ha-penim)

"Minister" article links to template Template:Israeli ministers, but only the other article "Ministry" links to Hebrew article. usally, there is one "Minister" article linking to both. there is a need to choose one of them and merge. --109.186.62.73 (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Help

can you see/comment on this: User_talk:Lihaas#editor_issues(Lihaas (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).

I've answered

I've answered. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for 1920–21 Southern Football League

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Featherstone RUFC

Hi, I notice that you have made contributions to the Featherstone article. The current rugby league club, Featherstone Rovers, wasn't founded until 1902, and appears to have no links to the earlier rugby union (RU) club. However, I have contributed to an article about James "Jimmy" Metcalfe, and I have found details of him playing for Yorkshire (RU) in 1896/7 while playing at Featherstone (RU), would you have any information about the RU club of the 1800s in Featherstone. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your prompt response. Would you be interested in helping me extract a cache of gold from a military dictatorship in the third world? =;o). Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Egypt help

there is a discussion that is ongoing and someone has gone and moved the page alread in 4 hours when most people havent even been able to discuss as they are sleeping in the region where the event occurs. Furthermore the name is being discussed and the current one is unilaterally against MOS.[3]

please also see the commetns after the unilateral posting,even for those who supported the move the proper noun name was absolutely unilateral.(Lihaas (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)).

Thanks

For updating the Ethiopian election pages that you've done. It is hard to find detailed information on Ethiopian topics, & every little bit helps. BTW, would you have any information about the Ethiopian referendum held in 2002 (if I have the year right), which led to the boundaries of the Oromo & Somali Regions being redrawn? I only know that it happened, & that the redrawn boundaries led to violence by & against the Oromo & Somali nationalities. -- llywrch (talk) 00:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Template

I am sorry, but why are you (almost) edit warring on Template:Kosovan elections? :)))

Templates, Talk:Kosovo-stub and Talk:Politics_of_Kosovo
(Kosovo Republic flag and Coat of Arms removal consensus)

Per this, no Kosovo flag should be used when only word Kosovo is in the question. Also, RoK was declared in 2008, so as this template backs to 2000, do you have ANY argument for that revert? And, template history may be at help. Even without this agreement, this flag should be removed per WP:MOSFLAG, and "Do not emphasize nationality without good reason", and not to mention "Use historical flags in contexts where the difference matters". Per all of this, flag should be removed. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 23:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

OMg! :) First and foremost, RoK does not have control over entire North Kosovo. That part is under control of Serbia. Then, your link made me think of one thing. In that template, some elections (most) was not started by RoK, but template have RoK flag. So, your argument is that Kosovo is independent state, and therefor we should use the flag. Here on wiki, we have agreement that kosovo is not independent state, then a disputed territory, as you may see on Kosovo page. All flags was removed per agreements i told you already. I dont know are you aware of WP:ARBMAC, the most important ARB regarding this subject. Per that, it is not important what do you, or i think, then what is consensus agreement on wiki. We have agreement that flag should not be used. Per that, this template is not an exception. And one more friendly advice! :) Dont write "they can f*** off"... Some passing admin can react on that. We must edit wiki with a smile!! :) :) :) Anyway, what do you say? --WhiteWriter ^speaks 13:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

You are an admin? Then your non negotiable reaction is even stranger to me.... --WhiteWriter ^speaks 13:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Wow, very rude of you. Anyway, per that, this "conversation" is over, i suppose..... --WhiteWriter ^speaks 14:36, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

1981 Israeli Election

I may well have the wrong year. I tried to remember in which years (and consequently which subsequent elections) were affected by the changes. A lot of my reading comes from other Wikipedia articles which may also be wrong. Unfortunately when the Knesset changes as often as it does its hard to keep up. Since you have way more expertise with Israel than I have, feel free to make any corrections necessary. Quidam65 (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Crane Sports F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crane Sports F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crane Sports F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —WFC— 09:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Liga Leumit

Re FPL, have you got a source indicating that the Liga Leumit is no longer professional, as the source provided indicates there are two professional leagues in Israel. Eldumpo (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for responding swiftly, but as you know sourcing is the basis of any entries in Wikipedia. Where is the evidence that the 2nd level is no longer professional. Are there sources that indicate some of the current 2nd-level teams are not professional? As an aside, when did this restructuring take place, as presumably you agree that it was professional up to a certain year anyway? Eldumpo (talk) 20:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I can see where you're coming from, but hopefully you can see where I'm coming from, re the need for sources. I'm sure it would not be deemed acceptable for someone to add a pro league to the list without sources, on the basis of their knowledge of the league. Having said that, you clearly have a knowledge of the league and I accept the average attendances are on the low side. I do think that overall the source is a good one, as it's from FIFA and explicitly talks of two professional leagues, and sources should not be automatically considered irrelevant just because they are a few years old. The key point is the extent to which the change that happened for 2009/10 is significant enough to change the basis of the original source, and I would say the change is not necessarily significant enough to warrant it although this is the arguable point (if the Israeli FA had abolished the 2nd national tier and created 3 regional tiers instead that would be different). There are Hebrew references relating to the restructure at both Liga Leumit and 2008–09 Liga Leumit - do neither of those provide information on rationale for the restructure and change of professional status?

I don't agree with your assertion that Liga Leumit was never professional, as this goes against a good source (the only source at present). As a way forward/compromise, I suggest that LL is kept in the Pro list with the wording 'until 2008-09', but with a tag saying disputed/source needed (or similar), and that LL is also added to the not pro list (which should in any case should say 'the highest non-professional league in a country's league structure) with the wording '2009-10 on'. What do you think? Eldumpo (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have now added Liga Leumit into the Pro list with a date cut-off. I did not put on a disputed tag but just noted that further sources are required, as this ties with the rest of the list, as most are now sourced. It would be good if sources could be found, although I suspect they may well be Hebrew language, and thus I will not be able to help in their search! Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 10:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the help to keep the Voorschoten '97 page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.67.7 (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Cheshunt Football Club

Thank you for your recent message though I feel I must take issue with you...

You have constantly reverted the Cheshunt Football Club history back to a truncated version (which, incidentally, I was also originally responsible for creating, though it has been edited so much it is hardly recognisable now) for no aparent reason. 1. You repeat the mantra that it is a 'wikified' version yet the longer, more detailed and more acurate version has many more links and sections conected with it so your reasoning becomes unclear. 2. Compare the two pages. It is clear the version you keep restoring contains less information, skips many individuals conected with the club and ends three years ago - giving the impression it has not been kept up to date. 3. You wiped the Cheshunt Stadium page, which I also created. You say it was not worthy of wikipedia. Why? It is an English sports ground, now in use for 61 years and having hosted several sports and noteworthy events. Several grounds of similar age and importance in the Isthmian league are allowed their own pages so why have you decided - on behalf of wikipedia - that Cheshunt Stadium shouldn't be on a par with them? 4. You point out spelling mistakes yet, rather than correct them, you alter the entire page? 5. You say my connection with the club clashs with wikipedias own rules. I USED to be a committee member but left the club in 2009. I feel I am as qualified as anyone in the world to give an account of the clubs history and since leaving the club, I have written a 200-page club history and held an exhibition at the local museum.

I would be very interested to see your reasons for reverting a perfectly good club history back to a very short and unsatisfactory version and what knowledge you have of the club that qualifies you to do so? Incidentally, I have no interest in any of the other subjects you hold dear on this site and so shall not be altering the pages you have created, even though you have felt the need to alter mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waysider (talk • contribs) 09:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Rabbi Mayer Alter Horowitz - the Bostoner Rebbe of Yerushalayim

Dear Number 57

Back in December 2009 and January 2010 you wrote on my talk page regarding an article I wrote about Mayer Alter Horowitz, the Bostoner Rebbe of Yerushalayim.

You wrote, "The reason I deleted the article is that there was no assertion of notability - being a rabbi or the offspring of some notable does not confer notability. If you have independent, reliable sources that discuss him in length (e.g. the Jerusalem Post), then I would reconsider. пﮟოьεԻ 57 15:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately the English references you linked me to are not really enough - they mention his name, but nothing more. The first Hebrew link does not do much more, and the other ones are talkback comments and forum posts, which are not considered to be reliable sources. I'm sorry, but not every rabbi is automatically notable, just like neither is every priest or iman. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)"

I agreed with you at the time and understood that it would take time for his notoriety to be recorded in periodicals as he recently took over his father's position as Bostoner Rebbe. Over the past year or so he has been featured in the following news sources that I have collected for you here: https://sites.google.com/site/mosdosbostonint/in-the-public-eye

The independent reliable sources include: The Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem) The Jewish Press (New York) The Jewish Tribune (London) Hamodia (www.hamodia.com) Mishpacha Magazine (www.mishpacha.com) Yeshiva World News (theyeshivaworld.com)

It is not an exhaustive list, but it is what I have been able to get my hands on.

Please help me put back the page for Mayer Alter Horowitz so that it will stay up, and then I can start to update it and provide sources going forward

Thanks for your help, Number 57

BetzalelGersten (talk) 02:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Are you serious? You think you can wait two months and sneakily remove the infoboxes? It has already been determined that you are blatantly in the wrong and they are perfectly legitimate for being there. If you have a problem with the formatting display because the browser you use is coding wrong, take it up in the proper location I pointed out to you last time. Lets not waste our time arguing about this again, when having the infoboxes there has already been supported by the community and precedent in every other election article on Wikipedia.--Metallurgist (talk) 03:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Number 57. You have new messages at Metallurgist's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Europeada

can you restore Europeada's Europeada 2008 to my sandbox so i can save certain sourced details? thanks.Lihaas (talk) 10:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. Illl work a bit in my sandbox and then get back to you

Btw- is there an admin barnstar? b/c youre the best ever admin on WP ;) (like in the ireland thing, i asked your view, we opposed and i totally accepted your neutral opinion ;))Lihaas (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

wow, that was harsh...wasnt expecting anythung in the least ;)Lihaas (talk) 14:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: "Yugoslavian elections"

No, you please stop moving those articles. See the fine talk page Template talk:Elections in Yugoslavia. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

And you don't get to do something completely illogical in this group of articles just because it doesn't fit your wishful thinking how all election articles need to conform to the identical set of naming rules. Just because a few people said in 2007 we should use the overtly wrong demonym, that doesn't make them correct. The other user (Pelusu (talk · contribs)) also reverted one of your moves before me, so I suggest you move it to the common talk page per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Number 57. You have new messages at SunCountryGuy01's talk page.
Message added 01:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

League of Ireland players being deleted

A Plymouth Argyle fan has decided that most League of Ireland players aren't notable because the league isn't fully professional and players are failing both WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG, players apparently only should have articles if they've played in fully professional leagues, even if their notability comes from playing in Irish football. He's started by deleting Shane Duggan, has moved onto proposing deleting all Cork City's players, and it looks like it will continue on to the majority of League of Ireland players. Most of the discussion is here. Hsetne (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Mass deletion is proposed here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark McNulty (footballer) Hsetne (talk) 05:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Ami'ad

Hello, Number57. I see that you started the above article which I believe does not have any references, just looking quickly. I am interested in where you got your information, particularly the evidence that it was started by Palmach. You may well be right, but the book I am looking at, from the Jewish National Fund (1949). Jewish Villages in Israel. Jerusalem: Hamadpis Liphshitz Press. {{cite book}}: Text "page4" ignored (help) which has a paragraph on it and its establishment, doesn't mention Palmach. Says it was estab on Jewish National Fund land by "graduates of the Hanoar Haoved Movement." Unless you have a source specifically saying Palmach, I think I should change it, what think you? Snakeswithfeet (talk) 04:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

That's interesting. The Hebrew Wiki did not give a source either? I don't read Hebrew so I wouldn't recognise it if I saw it. Could you check it out? Snakeswithfeet (talk) 17:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

That's weird. When I go there the page is in English but there is a bar atop of it that says it has been automatically translated by Google. That is why I asked about your Hebrew. I was trying to check out the difference between the Palmach sent the founders there and the Palmach actually founded it themselves. Thanks for you help. Snakeswithfeet (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Wilhelma, Palestine

Hi Number 57, I just noticed that you started this article as well. I added a bit to the article, however I have an issue with the "Palestine" part as I noted on the talk page. When you have a minute would you check out my comment on talk and respond to it? Thanks! Snakeswithfeet (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi again, Number57. I did put my thinking on the talk page at Wilhelma as well, and would appreciate it if you put your objections to it there, as I seriously think it should be changed, and would like some other opinions, as well as yours, reflected there. Thanks! Snakeswithfeet (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Constituent Assemblies and Conventions

I'm strongly in favour of clearly stating when a "parliamentary" election was not to the usual parliament, but to a Constitutional Convention or Assembly, as those are vastly different kinds of institutions and elections. —Nightstallion 21:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Asterisk

Hi Number 57! I am working on this, and you just made me miss a series of articles, thinking the change was still in place :( please let me finish working, it will take a couple hours. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 09:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Kuniwo Nakamura

The last time I worked on that article last year, I didn't have a citation for those points, so I marked them as {{citation needed}} and moved on for the moment. If you were able to find a source "in 10 seconds" then I congratulate you on your speed and superior Google-fu. When your fellow editors ask for citation for something, you should provide the citation instead of removing the tags with spurious comments about correctness. Thank you for your contribution to keeping Wikipedia verifiable. cab (call) 15:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)