User talk:PER9000: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:42, 19 March 2007

I will probably not read this page much so please use my swedish discussion page: [1]. (English, Francais, 13375p34k and Svenska works fine.)

Speedy notice

A tag has been placed on Weeping Willows, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Seraphimblade 12:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conservapedia Block and sex

I got a kick out of your block for the comment on the conservapedia talk page on Sex. I got more of a kick out of the fact that the article does not exist and has been protected against re-creation. Last I checked, sex was a pretty important factor in making a family. If they hadent protected the page, I would have redirected it to an article on the stork or something. Overall, thats a joke. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also tried to find a definition for family friendly but there is none. Pretty convenient I guess - this way anything that is inappropriate can be removed and censored.

Inappropriate: anything that is not family friendly.
Family friendly: anything that is inappropriate.

"I must remember to doublethink in the future..." // PER9000 15:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please direct any comments or views of Conservapedia to my blog instead. Wikipedia is not the place to discuss the contents or policies of conservapedia. Thanks. PER9000 15:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BUT a discussion about the Wikipedia article about Conservapedia can be held on Talk:Conservapedia

Also: please remember to be friendly and try to respect people even if they do not share your values. I do not always do that and every time I regret not doing it. // PER9000 15:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on Starwood Festival

An RFC on the mention of child care and youth programming in the Starwood Festival article has been opened[2]. If you are interested, please read the information there and the discussion that led to it immediately above it[3] on the Starwood Festival discussion page. Your input would be appreciated. Rosencomet 19:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Also: please remember to be friendly and try to respect people even if they do not share your values. I do not always do that and every time I regret not doing it. // [[User:PER9000|PER9000]] 15:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
+=== RFC on Starwood Festival ===
+An RFC on the mention of child care and youth programming in the Starwood Festival article has been opened[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AStarwood_Festival#Request_For_Comment:_Child_Care_and_Youth_Programming]. If you are interested, please read the information there and the discussion that led to it immediately above it[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AStarwood_Festival#Family_Friendly_and_Youth_Programming] on the Starwood Festival discussion page. Your input would be appreciated. [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] 19:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)