User talk:Potočnik

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kriva Ćuprija.jpg A tag has been placed on File:Kriva Ćuprija.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC) List of novelists by nationality You might want to look at this. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 17:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC) AN notice You might be interested in the discussion at WP:AN#This page needs Admin attention regarding a situation you may be involved in. Equazcion (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Manjača Camp.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manjača Camp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Rettetast (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC) Twiinkle I am aware this may be tough but I hope that you stick with it. I think the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Polargeo (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2010 (UTC) VANDAL I will report you! I am tired of you vandalism revert without explanation. One more revert without LONG and normal explanation, and you will be reported. --Tadijaspeaks 18:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Potočnik. You have new messages at Tadija's talk page. Message added 19:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Tadijaspeaks 19:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Hej, reply! --Tadijaspeaks 19:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC) I gave my reasons, what did you mean by "She was born in 1927"? ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 19:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC) There was no Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1927. Only that. --Tadijaspeaks 19:30, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Politically no, there was no Bosnia and Herzegovina nor was there Croatia, Serbia, etc. But there was a Yugoslavia perhaps you'd like to call her a Yugoslav? ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 19:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Barnstar Hi, if you think the Yugoslav Barnstar is finished, could you please mark your request on Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Yugoslavia_barnstar as resolved? And, if not, comment what should be done? Thanks, Completefailure (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC) Non-free files in your user space Hey there PRODUCER, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:PRODUCER/Tito. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of files removed today here. Shut off the bot here. Report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Re:Tito GA Concerning the Tito article, I'd be glad to see it finally GA. The main issue is the incorporation of the Criticism section into the main text. It can't stay separate. Also the images need to be strictly per MOS:IMAGES. Be sure they're not too large and that they don't overlap, there also shouldn't be too many of them. The Foreign relations subsection is a relic from before I overhauled the article, it too needs to be incorporated. While I like the small decorations table, you should ask the folks at GA whether it should stay or not. Rework the main text and source it profusely with published works, as you know you can find many of those on Google Books One last tip - don't attract attention. Try to do all your edits in one big edit, then "mask" it with a smaller one. Big edit numbers on watchlists attract attention from Balkan nationalist IPs, and if the article is the subject of dispute, its not going to be GA. Good luck. :) As for the Order of Merit... well, I kind of liked the old Orden zasluga - it was an original Yugoslav order of merit. The new one's nice too, though, but I must admit I liked the old one more. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 17:17, 28 May 2010 (UTC) hm? You mean me, or someone else?? Keep in mind, that is designed for the crybabywhiners who go to the admins like 5 times in a day - kinda like that triple crown that direktor got not too long ago, if you know what I mean... (LAz17 (talk) 02:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)). Dude, that really is me... lol! Those maps indeed were outrageous! I guess I maybe was annoying regarding that. But the intentions were good, weren't they, so at least that is what matters? (LAz17 (talk) 01:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)) Ugh, sorry, I am in a bind as of late... so I'm really not able to be on here much. The outcome is that the maps are no longer up - hence the outcome is good? I'd say that the process was wrong. What kind of person says "lets come to an agreement..." no, that admin should be fined or something, there is no agreement with such nationalistic people like ceha... there is only one option - that the better map is used and the worse one discarded. Anything's better than his propaganda maps. About blueness - not sure what the "heavenly" is about. But... doesn't it make more sense to have the serbs as blue? And the croats are redish? I think it does. (LAz17 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)). Četnici LAzo, Četnici su kolaboratori i izdajice. Plus očajno su se tukli, jedina gora je bila ona jadna unovačena domobranska horda. :) Jao si ga hrvatima i bošnjacima da su dobili oni kojim slučajem rat, ta sve bi nas pobilo. Ovako svima lipo i dobro, lol ;) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 01:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Kolaborilali jesu, znas da nisam nikad kazo da nisu. Ali izdajnice - to zavisi... izdajnice za koga? Njima je bio cilj kraljevina - srpska jugoslavija, bolje receno. U tom smislu oni su tek bili izdajnice od 1944 kad je ih kraljvinska vlast otkacila. Do tad su radili svoju ulogu. Nebi reko da je nikome bilo lepo ni dobro - vidu se lepo posledice - veliki dugovi, drzava koja nije imala jaku centralnu vlast... i pare ka sloveniji vise nego drugim. Nema ni metro u bivsoj jugi. Sranje je kako god se pogleda - a sad je isto stanje ko pre drugog svetskog rata - kolonija/e od uglavnom zapadni snaga. Zakljucak... uvek se zavrsavaju poruke sa pesmom! Ko to vodi sve revolucije... [1] (LAz17 (talk) 03:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)). Who indeed does lead the revolution? :), probably those westerners. Polargeo (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Bah, that was from the song in the youtube link. Where's a youtube link from you, huh?! (LAz17 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)). Barnstar Thank you for the barnstar! :) Elizabeth of Bosnia is a person who has always fascinated me. The only thing left is changing its references so that page numbers are visible. Please feel free to correct any typos if you notice them! Surtsicna (talk) 17:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Ma jebi se Turcine Popusices ti za vandalizam.