User talk:Seb az86556

earlier on this program... (archives) (+)

2009 15255    july 2009 49597    august 2009 12718    september 2009 6884    october 2009 20650    november 2009 27742    december 2009 2010 38848    january 2010 31594    february 2010 18754    march 2010 14511    april 2010 18480    may 2010 9998    june 2010 13864    july 2010 17597    august 2010 6479    september 2010 12322    october 2010 22341    november 2010 6914    december 2010 2011 27363    january 2011 15692    february 2011 16618    march 2011 12744    april 2011 9267    may 2011 5866    june 2011 13911    july 2011 4768    august 2011 4600    september 2011 5340    october 2011 13038    november 2011 15661    december 2011 2012 5527    january 2012 6684    february 2012 6179    march 2012 7290    april 2012 8723    may 2012 10438    june 2012 5929    july 2012 7638    august 2012 14328    september 2012 16008    october 2012 9891    november 2012 1822    december 2012 2013 12285    january 2013 8185    february 2013 18650    march 2013 6264    april 2013

If it says what I'm guessing it says...

I don't get much of it, but could you read this and give me your one or 2 cents? thanks... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

It's on the US of A, literally "Land of the Americans". It calls itself a stub article, and indeed, it is. It gives a brief rundown of the history, starting from the point that today mainly descendants of European immigrants lived there, who had exstinguished most natives, had held deterred Africans as slaves, had become rich from their labour. While not doing that any more, they were still the richmost land on earth, ruling some other parts of it by forces of economy and occasional wars mostly now in Asia. Its inhabitants regarded themselves the most important folks somewhere between god and the rest of mankind and certainly above the pope (here you have to know that this is somewhat reminiscent of several local stories and legends and carries a connotation of self-irony: Hey, they can be as bold as we!) They called themselves Christians but their "pope" was called "president" and elected in a somewhat democratic looking way, where one needs huge amounts of money to spent to have a chance. Last, a superficial parallel is drawn between the "old world" role of the Roman Empire which brought culture "to us", and the current role of the USA in the world. That's about it. Greetings --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hm... that sounds a bit tuned down from what I understood... I trust you think that stuff is OK to write... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, it's (imho) at the brink of deserving a "not objective or impartial enough" QA sticker. Since we have no writers taking care of those on a regular basis, I've put it on my agenda to improve the article adding simple base facts on the country at least. --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 03:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, thank you; unfortunately, I am only fluent in Afrikaans, so I find myself unable to write anything in Kölsch, though I understand quite a bit. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 03:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Just the opposite with me :-) I am fluent in Kölsch and reading Afrikaans pretty well, regarding the fact that I never learned it, but am unable to write or speak it. --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

DREAM Act

I want to hear that why do you remove the correct information. My information about the voting result and immigration process are true, but you comment it is destruction. Currently the DREAM Act aritle is not the voice of all in the Wikipedia:Twinkle because I add the information. Also What you do mean "nope" on your editing comment? Woonhocho (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Partial revert; please provide references, and write better English. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

My edit of Arizona

How do you think that a edit that says "THERE WILL BE A COUP AGAINST JAN BREWER AND THE STATE GOVERNMENT IN THE COMING MONTHS"is a good edit.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 11:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Exactly. You tell me, since you're the one who made it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Well I see you Can't or won't give a straight answer.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 11:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

How is that not a straight answer? I gave you the diff, the diff clearly shows vandalism. Next time, look before you leap. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually it was not vandalism per se I admit I was wrong I'm guess I m to tired and when I saw "THERE WILL BE A COUP AGAINST JAN BREWER AND THE STATE GOVERNMENT IN THE COMING MONTHS" and a ip edit i guess I hit revert a little to fast. We both forgot to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith, well sorry will be more careful in the future.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 12:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I would've assumed good faith if this had been your first screw-up; it wasn't. Your "mistakes" are numerous. You alone are responsible for your edits, and cannot hide behind some good-faith stuff anymore. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 12:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Had you told me of my error I would of reverted my edit I may not be a editor with 1000's of edits but getting alot better but I don't think I have made tons of mistakes.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 12:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey, Seb

Thanks for your help at my user talk. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Your editing style violates Wikipedia policy

You need to be aware of this: Don't demolish the house while it's still being built. Your editing style plainly violates this aspect of Wikipedia policy. Time Will Say Nothing (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)