User talk:Toddst1: Difference between revisions

Rather than blocking me, perhaps you should block Ten Pound Hammer for calling edits "crap" and not being able to take a joke.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 06:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a second. You're allowed to use the term "poppycock" but I can't use the word "nonsense". This looks like a double standard.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 06:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How often do you use the term "poppycock"?--Lost Fugitive (talk) 06:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is it a personal attack to call a song nonsense?--Lost Fugitive (talk) 06:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further uncivil behavior from this user here: [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Black (talk • contribs) 06:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of trolling. Appears to be attempting to inflame this situation. I will refrain from feeding the troll.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 06:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My reversion to Trotski

I was working through recent edits made by IP 188.141.15.253, many - although not all - are clearly vandalism. I made the judgement on Trotski that as it is a disambiguation page for a varient spelling of "Trotsky", adding "Trosky" pages was nonsensical. Clearly if disambiguation pages were filled with everything that vaguely sound like something, things would get unmanagable fairly quickly. Nick Cooper (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TW

~~TW is not working now but was working this morning. Can you check this for me please? Thanks Minor4th • talk 19:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Nevermind -- signed in on a different computer and needed to purge the cache. Minor4th • talk 19:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Independentobservernz

Can I ask you to reconsider this block? I see it as a potential WP:DOLT case about a living person, and had instead protected the article and was asking the editor to explain specifically what was wrong with the material when you blocked him/her. I feel we should give him/her to explain what was wrong first. --Slp1 (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You bet. Will unblock now. Toddst1 (talk) 22:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks muchly!! I appreciate it. --Slp1 (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to the deletions made to Wikipedia on this subject, it is a DOLT situation. I have requested the page be deleted entirely as it still contains other factual mistakes based on further gossip and innuendo.

Page should be deleted because 1) The three brothers are not particularly famous enough for comments - owning a business is hardly newsworthy. 2) The Banks and Brash connection is not relevant to the article.

Regards, Independentobservernz