User talk:UninvitedCompany: Difference between revisions
Black Kite (talk | contribs) PROD nomination of Catherine Rodland. (TW) |
Roger Davies (talk | contribs) →Special permissions: new section |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 23:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 23:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Special permissions == |
|||
This note is to advise you that the Arbitration Committee have resolved by motion (13/15 arbitrators supporting) to remove access to CheckUser and Oversight on grounds of inactivity from editors who have not used the tools in the past twelve months. Access may be applied for afresh via CheckUser and Oversight elections. [[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 12:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:04, 8 May 2009
Old talk archived 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Away
| AWAY | This user is non-permanently away from Wikipedia as of June, 2008. This is because |
MacLellan Crest
Steifer is correct, Burk's give the crest as: a naked cubit arm, supporting upon the point of a sword, erect, a moor's head, all ppr. Mottoes: Think on; and Superba frango; ref link. In heraldry the moor is a black man, see link hereto. The artist in heraldry often adds features and I see no problem with ear rings; I have seen versions with a head band. yours Czar Brodie (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi! As a bureaucrat on Wikipedia, I'd very much appreciate it if you would fill in your details on the newly updated Bureaucrats page. Thanks! Majorly talk 14:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year
and Ring in the new.
Happy New Year!
From FloNight
RFC at WP:NOR-notice
A concern was raised that the clause, "a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge" conflicts with WP:NPOV by placing a higher duty of care with primary sourced claims than secondary or tertiary sourced claims. An RFC has been initiated to stimulate wider input on the issue. Professor marginalia (talk) 19:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Catherine Rodland
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Catherine Rodland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Doesn't appear to pass WP:MUSIC
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Kite 23:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Special permissions
This note is to advise you that the Arbitration Committee have resolved by motion (13/15 arbitrators supporting) to remove access to CheckUser and Oversight on grounds of inactivity from editors who have not used the tools in the past twelve months. Access may be applied for afresh via CheckUser and Oversight elections. Roger Davies talk 12:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)