User talk:Waggers: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:34, 9 April 2008

Welcome to my discussion page. -- Waggers.
Click here to leave me a new message

Please note that personal attacks or inflammatory messages will be removed.
Please try to keep discussions on topic.
Please sign your comments with four tildes (like this: ~~~~)
If you're replying to an existing message, please indent your message using colons. (If your message is over several paragraphs, please indent and sign them all. That way other users [including me] can respond to your individual points)
Unless you request otherwise, I'll usually reply on your talk page, and post a link to the reply here. In some circumstances (such as multi-user discussions) I'll do it the other way around - putting the reply here.

By the way, you can email me if you want but I check this talk page more frequently than that email account.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

What is the procedure for continued vandalism?

hi Waggers,

I am convalescing in the bath this evening, and am excited by the prospect of exploring how repeated vandalism is coped with in Wikipedia. Are you able to ping me a quick outline of how things would unfold? (assume I am able to compete in the arms race).

I am also curious - were you requested to protect this page, or are you a part time guardian? (Yesterdays edits were not reverted so quickly).

thanks in advance, 88.144.50.200

Why revert of Shaw (surname) ?

Cliff Shaw is an existing entry in WP -- not some random name. He was coauthor of some of the earliest papers in Artificial Intelligence with Alan Newell and Nobelist Herbert Simon. The edit summary did name him. You are free to fix your mistaken revert if you wish; I leave it to you. --71.162.82.56 (talk)

Senso Ryū Aikijūjutsu

I want it blanked I'm the author an I wish to blank the page plus the edits made by Nate are wrong he has put the sections with peoples ranks at the beginning of the article this is wrong so blank the damn page. He didn't work on it he only moved the work I pout into it around. So I have no rights as the author at all.

If you feel I have caused a problem with the organisation of the article then please change it, that was largely stylistic, however the removal of titles was not.--Nate1481(^t/_c) 21:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bardcom

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Bardcom. Tb (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

brisvegas

you think the rest of the brisvegas article is constructive? It's a load of crap: some friend of someone lived in Toowoomba and drove to Brisbane. Whoopee. I've been to Brisbane, California. It really is San Francisco's garbage dump. It's as relevant as the rest of the article. But really: hey, you caught me, good on you, maintaining the authority of The Wiki. Seriously.

Thanks for your intervention on my talk page

I appreciate it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

damn it waggers. Leave Mrs Smell be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.80.189 (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology for moving Fletcher o' leary.

Sorry, waggers, somebody deleted my article and i dont know how to remove the sign: crictiara for speedy deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by BudgieMikeInAmerica (talk • contribs) 13:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Watch out

Hi. Heads up. That IP has moved from the one which blanked my talk page twice last night and got blocked for it. Hopefully he'll do enough to get blocked again on this IP. Your talk page is now in danger, like mine was. Thanks also for reverting his vandalism of my talk page tonight. Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that guy got blocked, so the danger-level should be low. --136.160.160.102 (talk) 23:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:43, 9 April 2008 edit Refsworldlee (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 43,508 edits Undid revision 204534360 by 136.160.154.150 (talk) rv vandalism ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:34, 9 April 2008 edit undo 136.160.160.102 (talk) →‎Watch out: 2 centavoz Next edit →
Line 112:		Line 112:

	Hi. Heads up. That IP has moved from the one which blanked my talk page twice last night and got blocked for it. Hopefully he'll do enough to get blocked again on this IP. Your talk page is now in danger, like mine was. Thanks also for reverting his vandalism of my talk page tonight. [[User:Refsworldlee\|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee\|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee\|<small>(do)</small>]] 20:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)		Hi. Heads up. That IP has moved from the one which blanked my talk page twice last night and got blocked for it. Hopefully he'll do enough to get blocked again on this IP. Your talk page is now in danger, like mine was. Thanks also for reverting his vandalism of my talk page tonight. [[User:Refsworldlee\|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee\|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee\|<small>(do)</small>]] 20:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
			:I think that guy got blocked, so the danger-level should be low. --[[Special:Contributions/136.160.160.102\|136.160.160.102]] ([[User talk:136.160.160.102\|talk]]) 23:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)