User talk:William S. Saturn: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Revert to revision 395990182 dated 2010-11-10 19:45:37 by VQuakr using popups
2over0 (talk | contribs)
→‎Blocked: new section
Line 8: Line 8:
==Talkback==
==Talkback==
{{talkback|VQuakr|ts=19:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)}}
{{talkback|VQuakr|ts=19:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)}}

== Blocked ==

<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''&nbsp;for '''[[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] and [[WP:edit warring|edit warring]]'''&nbsp;on the page [[Talk:Waterboarding]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 22:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->
The relevant case is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding]]; more discussion is at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=396790119 Administrators' noticeboard]. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 22:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:50, 14 November 2010

Welcome to the talk page for William S. Saturn. Click here to begin a new section.

Talkback

Hello, William S. Saturn. You have new messages at VQuakr's talk page.
Message added 19:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Blocked

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing and edit warring on the page Talk:Waterboarding. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

The relevant case is Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding; more discussion is at Administrators' noticeboard. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]