User talk:Williamborg

Your comments (signed of course) are welcome. Candor & honesty are desirable, at least up to a point. Just click here and you can add a comment to my user discussion page.

Archives
To Do List March 2005 - January 2006 January 2006 - May 2006 May 2006 - December 2006 December 2006 - July 2009 Photos Sandbox 1 Sandbox 2 Sandbox 3 Sandbox 4 Sandbox 5 Qual Card References Terms Interiot's 2nd Tool

We have a problem. Help please.

Sorry but we have a problem. Some one is giving false info on the Islam in Iceland page. Giving false data. On the number of Muslims living in Iceland.

The Iclandic "Hagstofa" records everything of the matter. And their are 402 Muslims now living in Iceland.

http://hagstofa.is/?PageID=632&src=/temp/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=MAN10200%26ti=Mannfj%F6ldi+eftir+tr%FAf%E9l%F6gum+og+skr%E1ningu+1994%2D2008+++++++++++++%26path=../Database/mannfjoldi/Trufelog/%26lang=3%26units=fjöldi

Iceland is a very small country with a very small population so most things like this are recorded. I just want something done about this persons account who is making this false info editing.

I care about this website and always want to give facts with links to suport them. False info editing is a problem we need to deal with.

Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdalDrottinn (talk • contribs) 22:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Figured out how to access the referenced article and made the following change "The Association of Muslims in Iceland had 341 members in 2006<ref name="US">[http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71385.htm International Religious Freedom Report 2006]</ref>, which had grown to 402 in 2008<ref>{{cite web | title = Statistics Iceland | date = 2009 | url = http://www.statice.is/Statistics/Population/Religious-organizations | format = English | accessdate = 29 August 2009}}</ref>." Hopefully this addresses your concerns - if not send me another note.

Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 23:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your responds. I hope you can help me add some links. Also sorry to bother you. There are about 600 people in Iceland that have a backround from a country that has majority Muslim population. Some are of Bahai faith and most are Muslim. So the false claim that more than 1200 Muslims live here holds no water. That wouled mean that we had a few hundred Icelandic converts that didnt want to register as Muslims for some reson. The claim is ridiculous. If he/she had claimed it were 500-600 in stead of 402 I would have left it alone. I live in Reykjvík btw and never see any Muslims here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdalDrottinn (talk • contribs) 00:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

"clastic dike" not "clastic flow"

Thanks for uploading photos on the Touchet Formation of Washington state. I noticed an error in the caption for one of the photos (4th from top). It should read "Clastic dike penetrating Touchet layers. Photo taken in a road cut several miles up the Touchet Valley." Change "flow" to "dike" for accuracy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.142.137 (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Good catch! Change made. Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 14:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of the link to the website containing pictures of all national parks of Norway

Hello, on the 'List of national parks of Norway' there was my link to the website covering all existing and planned national parks of Norway (Goahteluoppal, Sjunkhatten etc. - I also updated the Wiki page with these parks) but it has been deleted by anti-spammers. The link was www.garycki.com/NORWEGIAN_NATIONAL_PARKS.html. It might have been considered as the 'self-promotion'. Please consider readdition of the link (I am not allowed to do so) if you find the source valuable. Some upload of pictures to Wikipedia may also be considered with the correct crediting. Also other links to www.garycki.com disappeared: from Lists of national parks of Sweden, Poland, Slovakia and Germany. [1] [2] [3] [4] The same ask for help regards these links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.60.217.12 (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Ive replied, here and here. thanks--Hu12 (talk) 13:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Hanford Site

Uranium Trioxide / Uranium Oxide plant - thanks for pointing that out... i tried to fix it. i combined it all into on and added info/refs. see what you think.

obviously the subject of processing facilities at hanford could have its own page but i dont feel like making it.

as for the 'see also' section, i have no idea why i put stuff in there. i just thought 'hmm,,, how about mentioning some other nuclear resrearch sites in the USA'. it seemed a bit silly to have a page on hanford without mentioning any of the other sites that it routinely interacted with an that were a part of the nuclear complex of the US. please feel free to delete/rerrange/add/whatever.

i think maybe eventually they need one of those big infobox type things at the bottom of the page, you know, like they have for other areas of interest.

thanks again for catching my mistake!!!!!!!!!! Decora (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Touchet Formation GA review

I have highlighted some minor changes needed for GA on Touchet Formation and have put the article GA review on hold for a week for these changes to be made. Polargeo (talk) 03:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox/doc

Hi,

Please note that this isn't a sandbox page: it's used to document the use of the template. If you would like to experiment, it would be better either doing it on the test cases page or in a personal sandbox. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks. For my own reference, see <nowki> Template:Glaciers </nowiki> Williamborg (Bill) 20:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Norway

It is of interest to note that among the more populous nations the nation with the highest per capita generation of electrical energy according to data in the annual World Almanac (data for 2005) is Norway. The generation in billions of kilowatthours is 135.8, the population is 4,627,926, and this results in a per capita figure of 29,344 kwhs per annum per person. The fact that hydro is plentiful evidently in Norway and that some, perhaps much, of the energy is sold to neighboring nations, even nations across the Baltic straits, might be a factor. Even so, this is more than twice the per capita generation of the U.S., often considered to be the nation with the greatest energy appetite. It also might be noted that other nations, including Canada and Sweden, rank higher than the U.S. and Finland comes in close behind. It would be of interest to me if this might be verified by others as a matter to be made more widely known. 66.81.246.73 (talk) 02:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Williamborg. You have new messages at Awickert's talk page.
Message added 05:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Figure I'd drop a message since I've been out of touch for a while and finally replied; you're under no obligation to reply, though; just a friendly notice Awickert (talk) 05:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Williamborg! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Øyvind Rimbereid - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the cleanup

Hi, Matt here. Thanks for cleaning up so many articles I've started... I am just getting the hang of this thing, and I have not always been good about all the little steps, like project designations. I welcome any thoughts, comments, criticisms, or suggestions you have. Happy geo-editing!--Qfl247 (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Glacial lake outburst flood

Please log in and sign your post (if the anon is you).[5] Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK: Infragravity waves

You're welcome, Williamborg. Thank you for the interesting article. Till I came across this article of yours, I didn't know that things happening on the North American coast affect the Antarctica like that. Thank you sharing the knowledge. Please feel free to post alternate hooks for DYK on T:TDYK. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 23:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad that you approved of the hook. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Infragravity waves

On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Infragravity waves, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Medicinernes Skiklub Svartor

Hello. I am contacting you because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Norway, and the above-mentioned article is sourced by all Norwegian-language references. Moreover, the references do not appear to support notability; they might be mere trivial references to the subject. Since these sources are all offline, and I do not speak or read Norwegian, I'm hoping whether you can assist me in determining whether the article qualifies for speedy deletion. Many thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 12:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I see you've already had responses - sorry about the delay, but the real world is taking a bit of time these days. The article is not highly notable, but not a candidate for speedy deletion either. Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 18:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Amalie Skram

Please note that Forraadt (Betrayed) by Amalie Skram was translated into English by Aileen Hennes and published by Pandora Press, Routledge & Kegan Paul in 1986.Madso.hennes (talk) 23:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Article you started was deleted

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirty Years' War and Norway. If you should wish for a deletion review I'd support this. __meco (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Thoughts in order of occurrence:

• Very much appreciate your notifying me. It has always seemed appropriate to me to notify the original author and any serious contributors to the article when nominating it for deletion.
• That was an early editing attempt of mine & certainly did not meet current Wikipedia standards. I started it because 5 years ago there was a dearth of material in Wikipedia on that period of Norwegian history, and most of it focused on the actions of the ‘great powers’ of the period.
• Like most of my early articles, that article was probably pretty immature. Whether it was “original research”, I can’t tell without looking at the now deleted text, but would be more than a little surprised as there are references for the period.
• Being unable to access a deleted article I can’t be sure, but I’d suspect that had I participated in the review I’d have supported user:Geschichte’s viewpoint. He’s normally pretty balanced. And besides I started the Torstenson War article about the same time – find it dramatically improved – and suspect it covers the material well enough to fill the need.
• That said, it might have been interesting to actually have seen the article so I could compare it with the Torstenson War article. If you’re an admin, I’d appreciate your providing a link to the deleted article so I can review it to see if I care strongly. If not, c’est la vie – the community has spoken.

Thanks for your thoughtfulness & civility in notifying me - Williamborg (Bill) 15:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. __meco (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Appreciate your advising me. Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 15:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

CFD nomination

You may be interested in voicing your opinion at current CFD nomination, as it also concerns Category:Cities and towns in Norway and other Norwegian categories. - Darwinek (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Chernobyl

Took some time, but I got a Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) of a Generation II PWR Westinghouse Three-Loop Power Plant. I'm very busy this week, so will make this short, then I will fully address this issue next week. But in the FSAR, it says that you do not need Residual Heat Removal System (RHRS) to maintain Hot Standby, which is Mode 3. Mode 3 is 0% Power, Subcritical conditions (I think it's <0.99, I'll double check that later), and Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature of 250 - 350 F (I'll have to double check the temperature). It states that you need AFW in order to maintain the Steam Generators (SGs) as a heat sink and this will create a natural circulation condition sufficient enough to remove decay heat. A SCRAM due to Loss of Offsite Power (LOSP) happens a lot in the industry, the best example is when the North East of USA and areas of Canada had a major blackout. Almost 20 nuclear power plants experienced a LOSP and they all lost their Reactor Coolant Pumps (RCPs) (this applies to PWR). Nuclear power plants don't consider RCPs safety loads, so they are lost and never recovered without Offsite power. Hence, without RCPs, you lose Forced Cooling in your RCS, HOWEVER, there was not one report of core damage from those power plants or any other power plant that is designed to handle a LOSP. Generation II are designed to survive a LOSP event resulting in Natural Circulation of the RCS. Some plants will then choose to return to Mode 1 from Mode 3, or some will decided to move to Mode 5 or further by use of their RHRS. It takes a considerable amount of time to hook your RHRS up to your RCS due to safely depressurizing and lowering your temperature of the RCS. RHRS in general can only operate with the RCS when the RCS is in the 300's in regards to both temperature (F) and pressure (lbs). So I finish this "short" response saying that Generation II PWRs do not require forced cooling to maintain a shutdown condition, or more specifically Mode 3. I will make reference to the FSAR shortly. Your problem is that you loosely refer to a shutdown or use the word "immediately" after a shutdown is just not true. It's very simple and happens all the time: RCPs tripping will cause a Reactor Trip, your RCPs begin to coast down and you start to loose forced cooling as the Reactor is tripping (< 2 seconds). Very soon after you are left with no RCPs running and your rods resting at the bottom of the core and these reactors survive every time, they are designed to according to the FSAR. Gilawson (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I reviewed your source. You are referring to a SRP! That's a guideline for NRC staff! I quote from the documents which is located on the front page of every section, "This Standard Review Plan, NUREG-0800, has been prepared to establish criteria that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff responsible for the review of applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants intends to use in evaluating whether an applicant/licensee meets the NRC's regulations. The Standard Review Plan is not a substitute for the NRC's regulations, and compliance with it is not required." This is a very bad reference to use to justify what a nuclear power plant can and cannot do. But either way, I tried to read into it to find what you were trying to show and couldn't find it. Actually, I found the opposite in section 15.2.1. - 15.2.2. "In all light-water-cooled reactors, sensible and decay heat can be removed through actuation of one or several of the following systems: steam relief system, steam bypass to the condenser, reactor core isolation cooling system (BWR), emergency core cooling systems, and auxiliary feedwater system (PWR)." I hope this shows you that this is a bad reference as it's just a guideline of what NRC staff should adhere to when licensing a nuclear power plant.

I'll copy section 7-4 Systems Required for Safe Shutdown from a FSAR of a PWR in the USA:

7.4 Systems Required for Safe Shutdown* The functions necessary for safe shutdown are available from instrumentation channels that are associated with the major systems in both the primary and secondary of the Nuclear Steam Supply System. These channels are normally aligned to serve a variety of operational functions, including startup and shutdown as well as protective functions. There are no specifically identifiable safe shutdown systems: however, prescribed procedures for securing and maintaining the plant in a safe condition can be instituted by appropriate alignment of selected systems in the Nuclear Steam Supply System. The discussion of these systems together with the applicable codes, criteria and guidelines is found in other sections of this safety analysis report. In addition, the alignment of shutdown functions associated with the engineered safety features which are invoked under postulated limiting fault situations is discussed in Chapter 6 and Section 7.3. For a description of systems required for safe shutdown due to fire, refer to Safe Shutdown Analysis in case of fire (SSA). The instrumentation and control functions which are required to be aligned for achieving and maintaining safe shutdown of the reactor that are discussed in this section are the minimum number under non-accident conditions. These functions will permit the necessary operations that will: a) Prevent the reactor from achieving criticality in violation of the Technical Specifications, and b) Provide an adequate heat sink such that design and safety limits are not exceeded. The modes of shutdown are defined in Chapter 16 as follows:

Mode No.	Mode Condition	Reactivity Keff	% Thermal Power**	Rated Avg. Coolant Temperature
3	Hot Standby	<0.99	0	≥ 350 F
4	Hot Shutdown	<0.99	0	350 F > T avg. > 200 F
5	Cold Shutdown	<0.99	0	≤ 200 F

• Further information is contained in the TMI Appendix.
• Excluding decay heat

7.4.0-1 Amendment No. 50

• • • NPP FSAR

7.4.1 Description Functions required to achieve and maintain the above conditions of shutdown are: a) Proper boration and reactor coolant inventory b) Auxiliary feedwater supply c) Removal of residual heat 7.4.1.1 Systems & Equipment Used for Modes of Shutdown. Systems and equipment used for the modes of shutdown include: (Note: The equipment listed below which is preceded by an asterisk (*) is considered required for the mode of shutdown described. Equipment not preceded by the asterisk is desirable, but not required).
a) Hot Standby

• Auxiliary feedwater system
  
• Boric acid transfer pumps
  
• Steam generator safety valves (No I&C required)
  

Reactor Coolant Inventory Control (CVCS)
Letdown

• Charging
  
• Pressurizer heaters
  

Pressurizer sprays

• Steam generator power operated relief valves
  

Pressurizer power operated relief valves
Reactor Coolant Pump (with auxiliaries)
b) Hot Shutdown

• Auxiliary feedwater system
  
• Boric acid transfer pumps
  
• Steam generator PORV's
  

Reactor coolant inventory control (CVCS)
Letdown

• Charging
  
• Residual heat removal pumps (p < 363 psig)
  

Pressurizer heaters and sprays (if not solid)
Pressurizer power operated relief valves
Reactor Coolant Pump (with auxiliaries)

• Accumulator isolation valves
  

c) Cold Shutdown

• Residual heat removal system
  

Boric acid transfer pumps
Reactor coolant inventory control (CVCS)
Letdown
Charging
7.4.1-1 Amendment No. 48

• • • NPP FSAR
      

Supporting systems and associated equipment required for the modes of shutdown include:

• Component Cooling Water System
  

~* Service Water System
~* Onsite Power Supply System - diesel generators and batteries

• Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage and Transfer System
  

26 HVAC Systems/Chilled Water for areas containing equipment required for the modes of shutdown
~* ~ Control Room Panels or Auxiliary Control Panel
* ~ Emergency Lighting

Sorry, the paste and copy was a bit messy, I tried to clean it up as much as I could. I would be interested if you could find a good reference that says that a PWR needs forced cooling immediately after any type of shutdown. Also that a PWR requires forced cooling to maintain a shutdown mode, more specifically Mode 3. But as you can see for yourself, in order to achieve Mode 4 or 5, you do need forced cooling by the use of your RHRS. But again, Mode 3 is a shutdown mode too. Gilawson (talk) 01:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Historic Farms of Norway

Category:Historic Farms of Norway, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. TheGrappler (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

DOI Lookup Tool

"DOI Lookup Tool". unknonw. doi:10.1130/G31371.1. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Clastic wedge Louis Néel Proglacial lake Glacial Lake Minong Drumlin field Kame delta South African nuclear program Glacial Lake Tonawanda The Quest for Shakespeare Glacial Lake Duluth WIPB Outwash fan Tyrrell Sea Hannah Marks Ancylus regularis Glacial Lake Ojibway Early Lake Erie Ribbon lake Lake Connecticut

Cleanup BP Air travel disruption after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption Rogen moraine Merge Middle latitudes Religious text Functional derivative Add Sources Oil spill Glacial Lake Bassano Affirmative action Wikify Electric Vehicle Grand Prix Dave Murzin Nanogeoscience Expand Subglacial volcano Ice field Origin of the Oak Ridges Moraine

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

List of lakes in Norway

Hi, I see you're the creator of List of lakes in Norway. I'm trying to get a discussion going regarding tidying it up. Do you have any thoughts you'd like to add? Thanks. LordVetinari (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

August 2011 Wikification Drive

Oregon photos/time travel

Hi, thanks for all the great Oregon photos! I noticed your camera is saying that it's 2012, not 2011. Are you from the future? Or can you change your camera setting? Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 04:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yeager-Rock-Erractic-PB110039.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Yeager-Rock-Erractic-PB110039.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Touchet-formation-2.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Touchet-formation-2.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)