Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up to Now (autobiography): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 24: Line 24:
:Significant integrity issues here, sadly. [[User:Time Will Say Nothing|Time Will Say Nothing]] ([[User talk:Time Will Say Nothing|talk]]) 05:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
:Significant integrity issues here, sadly. [[User:Time Will Say Nothing|Time Will Say Nothing]] ([[User talk:Time Will Say Nothing|talk]]) 05:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
:[[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] now threatens me with sanction for alleging vandalism against him or her. A rogue editor abusing his or her position. Seeking to act as judge and jury in an allegation of vandalsim against him or her - inappropriate. Now attempting to move towards a block, in order to prevent me from contributing to this discussion. independent intervention, please. [[User:Time Will Say Nothing|Time Will Say Nothing]] ([[User talk:Time Will Say Nothing|talk]]) 06:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
:[[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] now threatens me with sanction for alleging vandalism against him or her. A rogue editor abusing his or her position. Seeking to act as judge and jury in an allegation of vandalsim against him or her - inappropriate. Now attempting to move towards a block, in order to prevent me from contributing to this discussion. independent intervention, please. [[User:Time Will Say Nothing|Time Will Say Nothing]] ([[User talk:Time Will Say Nothing|talk]]) 06:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
:: Further, I have been the persistent target of cyberbullying by editors including [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]]. I was told that alleging bullying was grounds for a block. Cyberbullying is a criminal offence. It is Wikipedia policy to use a block in order to prevent a justified allegation of a criminal offence by an officer of Wikipedia? I am sure that is not the case. Does Wikipedia have a policy on cyberbullying by editors or administrators? If so, could I be directed to it, please? Thanks. [[User:Time Will Say Nothing|Time Will Say Nothing]] ([[User talk:Time Will Say Nothing|talk]]) 06:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:11, 7 January 2011

Up to Now (autobiography)

Up to Now (autobiography) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log  • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this article on 4 January. Since then it has been disruptively edited and vandalised beyond recognition. I am not able to edit to construct it further because of this. As the author, I would therefore like for it to be deleted Wikipedia:CSD#G7 Also, I have repeatedly placed sources on the page which are repeatedly deleted by editors or administrators. Therefore the page does not have recognised sources.

It is also said to fail the notability criteria.

Merging with an article on its author is proposed. But nothing would be added to that article by the bare information contained here

This request was initially denied by an administrator SarekOfVulcan who has previously blocked me for an alleged edit war where he did not block the other party - it takes two to edit war, except apparently on Vulcan. He has since alleged a breach by me of the three-revert rule although I have made no such breach. His or her actions appear ego-driven. Unfortunately, the only conclusion is that this administrator has personal issues with me and is not an appropriate person to resolve this.

The refusal seems bizarre and arbitrary. This page is very short, it is not progressing and is subject to multiple tags and criticism. The best thing for it would be deletion. There is nothing to be gained by keeping it - and I say that as its creator and author. Time Will Say Nothing (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This editor is one of those who has disrupted and vandalised the creating of the article. There is nothing to be gained by a merger. Independent review, please? Time Will Say Nothing (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please redact the above personal attack, TWSN. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I've flagged the article for {{Rescue}}, because the terms it's spoken of in the books TWSN has mentioned suggests to me that it should have WP:reliable sources out there, if someone can find them. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is arbitrary and vexatious. I added sources that were repeatedly deleted for not being relevant. Now it is said that these sources are somehow relevant!
Not a personal attack, but valid reasons why neither this admin nor this editor should be involved in this process. Admin and editor challenge my actions on principle. Alleging vandalism and disruptive editing is not a personal attack but airing a legitimate concern.
Significant integrity issues here, sadly. Time Will Say Nothing (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 now threatens me with sanction for alleging vandalism against him or her. A rogue editor abusing his or her position. Seeking to act as judge and jury in an allegation of vandalsim against him or her - inappropriate. Now attempting to move towards a block, in order to prevent me from contributing to this discussion. independent intervention, please. Time Will Say Nothing (talk) 06:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Further, I have been the persistent target of cyberbullying by editors including Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556. I was told that alleging bullying was grounds for a block. Cyberbullying is a criminal offence. It is Wikipedia policy to use a block in order to prevent a justified allegation of a criminal offence by an officer of Wikipedia? I am sure that is not the case. Does Wikipedia have a policy on cyberbullying by editors or administrators? If so, could I be directed to it, please? Thanks. Time Will Say Nothing (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]