Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Empty. rm Noobhunterhooo (blocked indef by Mentifisto (ACB)).
Line 25: Line 25:


List begins BELOW this line -->
List begins BELOW this line -->

Dear Editors, This is to inform you that editors on WP:India and WP:Goa are behaving very adamantly. A major objection is being raised on WP:Goa as far as it's geographical territory is concerned, but instead of trying to find out the facts and the ground realities the editors are just counter-attacking and calling it vandalism and blindly deleting/archieving all discussions. May I know what is the basis applied? All resources and references have been provided but no effort has been make to solve the issue.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Goa&diff=296154212&oldid=296136517][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Goa&diff=296304829&oldid=296302202] This is not a view of a single person but a represented voice of thousands of Gaunkars of Goa. Kindly look into the matter in the best interest of wikipedia.--[[User:Gaunkars of Goa|Gaunkars of Goa]] ([[User talk:Gaunkars of Goa|talk]]) 13:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:44, 14 June 2009

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 08:50 on 28 March 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.




    Alerts

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Dear Editors, This is to inform you that editors on WP:India and WP:Goa are behaving very adamantly. A major objection is being raised on WP:Goa as far as it's geographical territory is concerned, but instead of trying to find out the facts and the ground realities the editors are just counter-attacking and calling it vandalism and blindly deleting/archieving all discussions. May I know what is the basis applied? All resources and references have been provided but no effort has been make to solve the issue.[1][2] This is not a view of a single person but a represented voice of thousands of Gaunkars of Goa. Kindly look into the matter in the best interest of wikipedia.--Gaunkars of Goa (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]