Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
→YellowMonkey: enacting motion 2 |
→John J. Bulten: removing |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<br clear="all"/> |
<br clear="all"/> |
||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header}} |
||
== John J. Bulten == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Brendanology|<font color="navy">'''→ Brendan'''</font>]] <small>'''([[User talk:Brendanology|<font color="orange">talk</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Brendanology|<font color="green">contribs</font>]])'''</small> '''at''' 06:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=== Involved parties === |
|||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{userlinks|Brendanology}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{userlinks|John J. Bulten}} |
|||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJohn_J._Bulten%2FFriends&action=historysubmit&diff=403845405&oldid=402543291] |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-01-04/Longevity myths]] |
|||
*[[Talk:List_of_the_verified_oldest_people#Merge_proposal]] (slightly more informal, but (failed) attempt at dispute/difference resolution by several users seen) |
|||
*[[Talk:List_of_the_verified_oldest_people/Archive_14#Bolding_war]] (Ditto) |
|||
=== Statement by Brendanology === |
|||
*I will confess that I have not always been entirely civil in my interactions with John J. Bulten; however, ArbCom will be shown evidence that repeated attempted dispute resolution on longevity-related articles (both official and unofficial) with Bulten has failed time and again or shown to have been counterproductive. Bulten has behaved inappropriately on multiple longevity-related articles, such as a) intimidating and attempting to convert editors [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_the_verified_oldest_people&diff=390808826&oldid=390800593], b) threatening editors with blocks without prior attempts to seek consensus [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brendanology&diff=390795674&oldid=390779455], c) submitting batches of biographies on long-lived people for deletion under near-identical criteria; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Margaret_Skeete][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukichi_Chuganji][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Louisa_Thiers][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maude_Farris-Luse] d) spamming the same AfD message with minimal differences [see diffs for c)], e) broken multiple AfD contributing policies (such as not voting on your own AfD [again, see diffs for c)], attempts, using spammed messages, to scare off editors who voted "keep" on articles he nominated for deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukichi_Chuganji&diff=400687088&oldid=400653104][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukichi_Chuganji&diff=400921954&oldid=400910357][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Margaret_Skeete&diff=400920925&oldid=400912119]. |
|||
The request sent to ArbCom is intended as a last resort; an ArbCom discussion will provide solutions to John J. Bulten's disruptive and damaging behaviour for which previous attempts of resolution have failed time and again. [[User:Brendanology|<font color="navy">'''→ Brendan'''</font>]] <small>'''([[User talk:Brendanology|<font color="orange">talk</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Brendanology|<font color="green">contribs</font>]])'''</small> 08:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === |
|||
=== Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.'' |
|||
:I have left a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABrendanology&action=historysubmit&diff=403858826&oldid=398844654 note] on the filing party's talkpage regarding the ongoing Longevity case involving both parties. [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 11:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:The filing party has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlexandrDmitri&diff=prev&oldid=403991490 contacted me] regarding this request for arbitration and I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlexandrDmitri&diff=next&oldid=403991490 explained] that he or she may address this issue at the ongoing case. [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 07:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/4/0/0) === |
|||
* '''Decline'''. There is already an ongoing case regarding these disputes (''Longevity''); I see no reason why opening another would be necessary or beneficial. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] <sup>[[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|[talk]]] [[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism|[prof]]]</sup> 16:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Decline''' per Kirill. Perhaps there may need to be consideration of a temporary injunction in relation to the existing case. [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 16:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Decline''' as a separate case, but the issues can be addressed in the pending ''Longevity'' case, as suggested by Kirill and Risker. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 16:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Decline'''. Existing case. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 20:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:05, 25 December 2010
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Case name | Closed |
---|---|
Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Requests for arbitration
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|