Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/010 Editor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Badger Drink (talk | contribs) →010 Editor: del |
Scottywong (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete''' I don't think the sources constitute significant coverage. --<span style="text-shadow:#DDDDDD 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 23:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' I don't think the sources constitute significant coverage. --<span style="text-shadow:#DDDDDD 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 23:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. "Significant coverage" means more than [[WP:ITEXISTS|passing mention]]. [[User:Badger Drink|Badger Drink]] ([[User talk:Badger Drink|talk]]) 04:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. "Significant coverage" means more than [[WP:ITEXISTS|passing mention]]. [[User:Badger Drink|Badger Drink]] ([[User talk:Badger Drink|talk]]) 04:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - Fails [[WP:NSOFT]]. Not notable. [[User:Snottywong|<span style="font-family:Copperplate;font-size:15px;border:#AAAACC 1px solid">{{#if:Snotty|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF;color:#008822;">Snotty</span>|<span style="color:#008822;">#DDDDFF</span>}}{{#if:Wong|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF;color:#006611;">Wong</span>|<span style="color:#006611;">#DDDDFF</span>}}</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Snottywong|talk]]</small> 23:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:48, 8 June 2010
010 Editor
- 010 Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 03:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 08:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I can find significant coverage for this software and have added some citations to the article. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - despite refs found by Colonel Warden - it is just a hex editor and not relay notable. Codf1977 (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think the sources constitute significant coverage. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. "Significant coverage" means more than passing mention. Badger Drink (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:NSOFT. Not notable. SnottyWong talk 23:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)