Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maude Farris-Luse

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John J. Bulten (talk | contribs) at 05:38, 5 December 2010 (AFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Maude Farris-Luse

Maude Farris-Luse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Continuing nominations of nonnotable supercentenarians with no more than one reliable source per WT:WOP#Common deletion outcomes. I intend that, during discussion, any article supporters either find sources or merge sourced material to deal with the indisputable WP:GNG failure (the requirement of multiple reliable sources); without either of these actions, bare "keep" votes will not address that failure. I also intend that any who disagree with the WT:WOP proposal, which affirms GNG for deletion of these articles, should comment at that link. Article-specific details with my !vote below. JJB 05:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete as nom 10-sentence article mostly about unverifiable longevity OR/SYN with some nonnotable bio material. Sources are unreliable GRG (2), primary-source SSDI, and one 26-sentence CBS article that does not support some of the material in the WP article (unsourced research presumably by GRG members, with "citation needed" already in article) and is insufficient to demonstrate notability. Notability of one-source one-event bio should be demonstrated by a plurality of reliable secondary sources. JJB 05:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maude_Farris-Luse&oldid=400623054"