Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tane Ikai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John J. Bulten (talk | contribs) at 05:40, 5 December 2010 (AFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Tane Ikai

Tane Ikai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Continuing nominations of nonnotable supercentenarians with no more than one reliable source per WT:WOP#Common deletion outcomes. I intend that, during discussion, any article supporters either find sources or merge sourced material to deal with the indisputable WP:GNG failure (the requirement of multiple reliable sources); without either of these actions, bare "keep" votes will not address that failure. I also intend that any who disagree with the WT:WOP proposal, which affirms GNG for deletion of these articles, should comment at that link. Article-specific details with my !vote below. JJB 05:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete as nom 13-sentence article completely about unverifiable longevity OR/SYN. Only source is one 5-sentence Tulsa World article that does not support most of the material in the WP article (unsourced research presumably by GRG members, with "citation needed" already in article since 12/2007) and is insufficient to demonstrate notability. JJB 05:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)