Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/KuduBot 3: Difference between revisions
re |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Fixing links to archived content. (BOT) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<!--Bot tasks require consensus in order to be approved. Please list any relevant discussions here to indicate consensus for the task. If such input is not necessary (for instance, a task that is duplicating or closely matching an existing bot) leave this blank--> |
<!--Bot tasks require consensus in order to be approved. Please list any relevant discussions here to indicate consensus for the task. If such input is not necessary (for instance, a task that is duplicating or closely matching an existing bot) leave this blank--> |
||
'''Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):''' [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#Request for hatnote bot]] |
'''Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):''' [[Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 43#Request for hatnote bot]] |
||
<!-- e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run, etc. --> |
<!-- e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run, etc. --> |
Revision as of 18:16, 19 September 2011
Operator: KuduIO (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 00:01, Monday September 12, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Automatic unsupervised
Programming language(s): Python and regular expressions
Source code available: Standard pywikipedia, regular expression / parameters may be available on request
Function overview: Move all hatnotes to the very top of the articles per the Manual of Style .
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 43#Request for hatnote bot
Edit period(s): One-time run, then daily
Estimated number of pages affected: ?
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Discussion
Are there *any* cases where the top is not the best place for a hatnote? Are some used in sections, perhaps? - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 17:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- They definitely could have been used there, so limiting to lead section is probably smart. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 17:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, that's one exception. Are there others? I assume we're limiting to article space here for a start? - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 18:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- How do you intend to find articles that suffer from this problem? Are you going to randomly crawl through every article, or is there a database report somewhere? —SW— comment 18:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Presumably by processing a dump (AWB can handle this). - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 20:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Right, just want to ensure that the operator is willing/able to download and process a database dump. —SW— confabulate 21:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- This will be done by accessing the database directly from the toolserver. — Kudu ~I/O~ 20:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is not possible. The toolserver database does not include page text. —SW— verbalize 22:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- This will be done by accessing the database directly from the toolserver. — Kudu ~I/O~ 20:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Right, just want to ensure that the operator is willing/able to download and process a database dump. —SW— confabulate 21:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Presumably by processing a dump (AWB can handle this). - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 20:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)