Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 March 7: Difference between revisions
creating for new day |
Grundle2600 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
||
====[[:Michelle Obama's arms]]==== |
|||
:{{DRV links|Michelle Obama's arms|xfd_page=XFD Michelle Obama's arms|article=}} |
|||
Ten months ago, when [[User:Prodego]] closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms]] and deleted the article, [[User:Prodego]] commented, "This is obviously not a topic that is appropriate for an encyclopedia." |
|||
I'd like to ask that [[Michelle Obama's arms]] be undeleted because: |
|||
1) There is no wikipedia policy for what is "obviously" a topic for the encyclopedia. |
|||
2) Here in the year 2010, the subject is still being covered by [http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/03/michelle_obamas_toned_arms--ho.html The Chicago Sun Times], [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1255753/Bend-like-Obama-First-Lady-Michelle-shows-football-skills.html The Daily Mail], [http://news.oneindia.in/2010/02/21/meetthe-man-behind-michelle-obamas-tonedarms.html Oneindia.in], [http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/03/2834820.htm?site=thedrum The Australian Broadcastng Corporation], [http://www.abcactionnews.com/content/news/local/hillsborough/west/tampa/story/Get-your-arms-and-shoulders-looking-good/DDjGGBzZcEiTzW2M6J540Q.cspx ABC News], [http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/beauty/the-new-style-icons-20100301-pbwg.html The Sydney Morning Herald], [http://blogs.wsj.com/privateequity/2010/03/05/the-week-in-private-equity-tip-of-the-hat-to-monty-python/ The Wall St. Journal], [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/22/governors-ball-2010-miche_n_471252.html Huffington Post], [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/21/fox-news-transcript-huckabee-interview-lady-michelle-obama/ Fox News], and [http://www.fitnessmagazine.com/workout/arms/exercises/how-to-get-michelle-obamas-arms-the-workout-plan/ Fitness Magazine]. |
|||
3) During the deletion discussion, some of the reasons given for deletion were that the subject was "trivial" and "just plain silly." These are not official wikipedia policies. |
|||
4) The subject meets the criteria for [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. |
|||
5) Wikipedia has a category called '''[[:Category:Famous body parts]]''' which would be appropriate for this subject. |
|||
[[User:Grundle2600|Grundle2600]] ([[User talk:Grundle2600|talk]]) 06:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:04, 7 March 2010
7 March 2010
Michelle Obama's arms
Ten months ago, when User:Prodego closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms and deleted the article, User:Prodego commented, "This is obviously not a topic that is appropriate for an encyclopedia."
I'd like to ask that Michelle Obama's arms be undeleted because:
1) There is no wikipedia policy for what is "obviously" a topic for the encyclopedia.
2) Here in the year 2010, the subject is still being covered by The Chicago Sun Times, The Daily Mail, Oneindia.in, The Australian Broadcastng Corporation, ABC News, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Wall St. Journal, Huffington Post, Fox News, and Fitness Magazine.
3) During the deletion discussion, some of the reasons given for deletion were that the subject was "trivial" and "just plain silly." These are not official wikipedia policies.
4) The subject meets the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability.
5) Wikipedia has a category called Category:Famous body parts which would be appropriate for this subject.
Grundle2600 (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)