Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Summary chart: remove 2 articles selected by Raul. The nonspecific has been on the page while Raul selected seven days, and per the rules, is deemed withdrawn at this time, it can be resubmitted
→‎Nonspecific date (1 only): deemed withdrawn as not selected by Raul who did not select it while selecting 7 or more other articles
Line 36: Line 36:


== Nonspecific date (1 only) ==
== Nonspecific date (1 only) ==
<div style="width:55%; background-color:#f5fffa; border:1px solid #cef2e0;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em; color: black">
<div style="float:left;margin-right:0.9em">
[[File:Katsura-Matsuyama exhibition ad.png|100px]]
</div>

'''[[Masako Katsura]]''' (1913–1995) was a [[carom billiards]] player most active in the 1950s who trailblazed a path for women in the sport by competing and placing among the best in the male-dominated world of professional billiards. First learning the game from her brother-in-law and then under the tutelage of Japanese champion [[Kinrey Matsuyama]], Katsura finished second in Japan's national [[three-cushion billiards]] championship three times. In [[Exhibition game|exhibition]] she was noted for {{Cuegloss|run|running}} 10,000 points at the game of [[Balkline and straight rail|straight rail]]. After marrying a U.S. army officer in 1950, Katsura emigrated with him to the United States in 1951, where she was invited to play in the 1952 U.S.-sponsored World Three-Cushion Championship, ultimately taking seventh place at that competition. Katsura was the first woman ever to be included in any world billiards tournament. Her fame cemented, Katsura went on an exhibition tour of the United States with 8-time world champion [[Welker Cochran]], and later with 51-time world champion, [[Willie Hoppe]]. In 1953 and 1954 she again competed for the world three-cushion crown, taking fifth and fourth places respectively. ([[Masako Katsura|'''more…''']].)
</div></div>
*<s>&nbsp;4&nbsp;</s> 3 points. I am the main contributor and have never had an article at TFA (1 pt); <s>Subject underrepresented (this is the ''only'' billiard-related FA) (1 pt)</s> and by the same token; a similar article has not been featured on the main page ever much less within 6 months (2 pts). Regarding the image (the only free one useful for the blurb) can the size be bumped up? I kept it at 100 px as that seems to be the standard but I don't think it works well at that size.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 16:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

*'''Support''' - need more billiards on mainpage definitely. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

:'''Three points''' Underrepresented is determining by taking the number of articles in its category at WP:FA and seeing whether it is more or less than fifty.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
::Aha. I see now--that information is in the footnote to the instruction.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]])
*'''Support''' - good to see a female biography from an unusual field as well. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 14:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Anything photo published in Japan in 1956 or earlier is in the public domain, and any photo taken in Japan in 1946 or earlier is in the public domain. (see [[Template:PD-Japan-oldphoto]]). For these reasons, it shouldn't be that hard to find a PD photograph of her. Can someone please look into this? [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 18:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
:You are all most welcome to try, with my blessings. I spent many, many hours on this and other issues (I must have spent 20 hours on finding her date of death, and was only able to confirm the year after great effort [though I actually know the exact date from a relative, but it's not verifiable]). The problem is that she left Japan and did not return for 39 years and there are very few accessible Japanese sources on her. Note that I enlisted the aid of Wikiproject Japan in all manner of help and translation and some very kind users there tried and were not able to find much. A nice image is here: <nowiki>http://park.geocities.jp/matukinrei/fhoto/km.JPG</nowiki> (the reason I have nowikied the url is, bizarrely, it is a dead link if you click on it but works fine if you copy and paste it into your address bar). This image was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Masako_Katsura&action=historysubmit&diff=357347386&oldid=357343757 formerly in the article]. I had uploaded it to the Commons but the problem was that though I had very strong inductive proof of its date, have no idea who took it, or when it was first published (the caption translation is no help), so there was no truly verifiable way to evidence it was PD. See among other places [[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit/Archive 12#Masako Katsura|here]] and its deletion at [[Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katsura, Matsuyama and Greenleaf.Jpg|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katsura, Matsuyama and Greenleaf.Jpg]].--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 00:26, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
* '''Support'''&mdash;Yep, agree with previous comments. Interesting perspective on a sports/game topic and the page appears to be in good shape.&mdash;[[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 00:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

* '''Support''' Makes a good read. Subject matter is engaging. I hope one day [[Judith Polgar]] gets to TFA, there are similarities. Regards, [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] <sup>([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]])</sup> 04:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


==Date requests (5 max)==
==Date requests (5 max)==

Revision as of 18:24, 31 January 2011

Here the community can nominate articles to be selected as "Today's featured article" (TFA) on the main page. The TFA section aims to highlight the range of articles that have "featured article" status, from Art and architecture through to Warfare, and wherever possible it tries to avoid similar topics appearing too close together without good reason. Requests are not the only factor in scheduling the TFA (see Choosing Today's Featured Article); the final decision rests with the TFA coordinators: Wehwalt, Dank and Gog the Mild, who also select TFAs for dates where no suggestions are put forward. Please confine requests to this page, and remember that community endorsement on this page does not necessarily mean the article will appear on the requested date.

  • The article must be a featured article. Editors who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it for TFAR.
  • The article must not have appeared as TFA before (see the list of possibilities here), except that:
    • The TFA coordinators may choose to fill up to two slots each week with FAs that have previously been on the main page, so long as the prior appearance was at least five years ago. The coordinators will invite discussion on general selection criteria for re-runnable TFAs, and aim to make individual selections within those criteria.
    • The request must be either for a specific date within the next 30 days that has not yet been scheduled, or a non-specific date. The template {{@TFA}} can be used in a message to "ping" the coordinators through the notification system.

If you have an exceptional request that deviates from these instructions (for example, an article making a second appearance as TFA, or a "double-header"), please discuss the matter with the TFA coordinators beforehand.

It can be helpful to add the article to the pending requests template, if the desired date for the article is beyond the 30-day period. This does not guarantee selection, but does help others see what nominations may be forthcoming. Requesters should still nominate the article here during the 30-day time-frame.

Purge the cache to refresh this page

 – Check TFAR nominations for dead links

 – Alt text

Featured content:

Featured article candidates (FAC)

Featured article review (FAR)

Today's featured article (TFA):

Featured article tools:

How to post a new nomination:

I.
Create the nomination subpage.

In the box below, enter the full name of the article you are nominating (without using any brackets around the article's name) and click the button to create your nomination page.


II.
Write the nomination.

On that nomination page, fill out as many of the relevant parts of the pre-loaded {{TFAR nom}} template as you can, then save the page.

Your nomination should mention:

  • when the last similar article was, since this helps towards diversity on the main page (browsing Wikipedia:Today's featured article/recent TFAs will help you find out);
  • when the article was promoted to FA status (since older articles may need extra checks);
  • and (for date-specific nominations) the article's relevance for the requested date.
III.
Write the blurb.
Some Featured Articles promoted between 2016 and 2020 have pre-prepared blurbs, found on the talk page of the FAC nomination (that's the page linked from "it has been identified" at the top of the article's talk page). If there is one, copy and paste that to the nomination, save it, and then edit as needed. For other FAs, you're welcome to create your own TFA text as a summary of the lead section, or you can ask for assistance at WT:TFAR. We use one paragraph only, with no reference tags or alternative names; the only thing bolded is the first link to the article title. The length when previewed is between 925 and 1025 characters including spaces, " (Full article...)" and the featured topic link if applicable. More characters may be used when no free-use image can be found. Fair use images are not allowed.
IV.
Post at TFAR.

After you have created the nomination page, add it here under a level-3 heading for the preferred date (or under a free non-specific date header). To do this, add (replacing "ARTICLE TITLE" with the name of your nominated article):
===February 29===
{{Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/ARTICLE TITLE}}

Nominations are ordered by requested date below the summary chart. More than one article can be nominated for the same date.

It would also then be helpful to add the nomination to the summary chart, following the examples there. Please include the name of the article that you are nominating in your edit summary.

If you are not one of the article's primary editors, please then notify the primary editors of the TFA nomination; if primary editors are no longer active, please add a message to the article talk page.

Scheduling:

In the absence of exceptional circumstances, TFAs are scheduled in date order, not according to how long nominations have been open or how many supportive comments they have. So, for example, January 31 will not be scheduled until January 30 has been scheduled (by TFAR nomination or otherwise).

Summary chart

Currently accepting requests from June 1 to July 1.

Date Article Points Notes Supports Opposes
Nonspecific
Mar 1 Posting system 2 Promoted over a year ago, anniversary 1 0

Tally may not be up to date; please do not use these tallies for removing a nomination according to criteria 1 or 3 above unless you have verified the numbers.

Nonspecific date (1 only)

Date requests (5 max)

9 February

Two ships close to the shore of a body of water near steep snow-covered hills. Much of the body of water is covered by sheets of ice.

In the "Black Friday" air attack of World War II a force of Allied Bristol Beaufighter aircraft suffered heavy casualties during an unsuccessful attack on German destroyer Z33 and her escorting vessels on 9 February 1945. The German ships were sheltering in a strong defensive position in Førde Fjord, Norway, forcing the Allied aircraft to attack through heavy anti-aircraft fire. The Beaufighters and their escort of North American P-51 Mustang fighters were also surprised by twelve German Focke-Wulf Fw 190 fighters. In the resulting attack the Allies damaged at least two of the German ships for the loss of seven Beaufighters shot down by flak guns. Another two Beaufighters and one Mustang were destroyed by the Fw 190s. Either four or five German fighters were shot down by the Allied aircraft, including one flown by an ace. Due to the losses suffered in this raid the Allied anti-shipping force adopted new tactics which placed a lower priority on attacking warships. (more…)

2 points - the article was promoted on 15 December 2010 and this will be the anniversary of the battle. I'm not sure when the last article on a World War II battle was the TFA, but I think that this is one of very few concerning aerial battles, which may also be worth another one or two points. Nick-D (talk) 06:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Minus one point. I would say that this is similar to John Lerew, TFA very recently, as being about WWII aviation. So one point date connection (65th anniversary, 1 pt), minus two.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm inclined to say let it run anyway, regardless of negative points. The two recent WWII TFAs were on a battle between the US and Japan in New Guinea, and a biography of an Australian pilot; while this is "similar" in the strict sense, it's different enough to avoid the "Wikipedia is obsessed with XXX this week!" issue, and has a clear date significance. Support. – iridescent 17:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Raul rejected the battle, saying it was too similar to the pilot ...--Wehwalt (talk) 18:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite—he rejected it because he ran Guadalcanal Campaign on the 15th and (rightly) said the battle (part of said campaign) was too similar to that. There isn't the same degree of similarity here. – iridescent 19:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, my mistake.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Interesting article, It is short and easy to read. Paulista01 (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13 February

A black-and-white newspaper illustration of a "suspicious-looking" man in a dark coat and hat walking past a poster marked "murder". A group of people in Victorian clothing are together looking speculatively at him

The Whitechapel murders are eleven unsolved brutal murders of women, committed in or near the impoverished Whitechapel District in the East End of London between 3 April 1888 and 13 February 1891. At various points some or all of the killings have been ascribed to the notorious, but elusive, individual known as Jack the Ripper. Most, if not all, of the victims were prostitutes. The Metropolitan Police Service, City of London Police, and private organisations such as the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee were involved in the search for the killer or killers. Despite extensive inquiries and several arrests, the culprit or culprits evaded identification and capture. The murders drew attention to the poor living conditions in the East End slums, which were subsequently improved. The enduring mystery of who committed the crimes has captured the imagination of writers to the present day. (more…)

2 points as 120 (multiple of 10) anniversary of the final Whitechapel murder. The last crime-based FA was 1962 South Vietnamese Independence Palace bombing on December 15, so no points either way on the "similar topics" front. GeeJo (t)(c) • 11:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 1

Hideo Nomo as a player for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays in 2005
Hideo Nomo as a player for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays in 2005
The posting system is a baseball player transfer system which operates between Japan's Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB) and the United States' Major League Baseball (MLB). Despite the drafting of the United States – Japanese Player Contract Agreement in 1967 designed to regulate NPB players moving to MLB, problems arose in the late 1990s. Some NPB teams lost star players without compensation, an issue highlighted when NPB stars Hideo Nomo (pictured) and Alfonso Soriano left to play in MLB after using loopholes to void their existing contracts. A further problem was that NPB players had very little negotiating power if their teams decided to deal them to MLB, as when pitcher Hideki Irabu was traded to an MLB team for which he had no desire to play. In 1998, the Agreement was rewritten to address both problems and was dubbed the "posting system". Under this system, when an NPB player is "posted", MLB holds a four-day-long silent auction during which MLB teams can submit sealed bids in an attempt to win the exclusive rights to negotiate with the player for a period of 30 days. If the MLB team with the winning bid and the NPB player agree on contract terms before the 30-day period has expired, the NPB team receives the bid amount as a transfer fee, and the player is free to play in MLB. (more...)

March 1st marks the end of the posting system's 11th posting period and the article was promoted over 1 year ago---Total: 2 pts. I really like this article. I think it's a good mix of sports and culture and is a relatively unknown part of baseball. --TorsodogTalk 06:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]