Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-07/News and notes: Difference between revisions
cut j.delanoy's piece to put in In the News instead |
deleting mention of the "wikipedian in residence" article - this detracts from the point of the project and could be construed as self-advertising. |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[File:An Van Camp with Dürer block.jpg|thumb|A British Museum staff member shows a Dürer print block to Wikimedians]] |
[[File:An Van Camp with Dürer block.jpg|thumb|A British Museum staff member shows a Dürer print block to Wikimedians]] |
||
[[File:Decorated battleaxe.JPG|thumb|Photo of a battle axe, taken during the "Backstage Pass" tour]] |
[[File:Decorated battleaxe.JPG|thumb|Photo of a battle axe, taken during the "Backstage Pass" tour]] |
||
Last week, [[User:Witty lama]] began his five week stay at the [[British Museum]] as "[[Wikipedia:GLAM/BM|Wikipedian in Residence]] (see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-03-15/News_and_notes#Wikipedian-in-Residence at the British Museum|earlier ''Signpost'' coverage]]). Around 40 Wikimedians joined him last Friday for a "[http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Backstage_Pass Backstage Pass]" event, consisting of private tours of some of the museum's public and non-public areas, followed by discussions and on-wiki collaboration with the staff. The New York Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/arts/design/05wiki.html covered] the event at length, explaining that the British Museum's motivation to collaborate with Wikipedia is "to help ensure that the museum’s expertise and notable artifacts are reflected in that digital reference’s pages". The article noted that museums and Wikipedia have as their common interest "educating the public: one has the artifacts and expertise, and the other has the online audience", but also mentioned possible conflicts, recalling the legal threats issued last year by the [[National Portrait Gallery]] against a Commons user who had uploaded high-resolution scans of public domain images from their collection (see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-07-13/Copyright threat|''Signpost'' coverage]]. As [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-June/058731.html remarked] last week by Mike Godwin, the NPG "did not press any legal challenge" subsequently.) Among the results of the tour are [[:commons:Category:Backstage Pass at the British Museum|photos]] and [http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Backstage_Pass#Results_of_the_day newly created articles] about the British Museum's artefacts, including several DYK nominations |
Last week, [[User:Witty lama]] began his five week stay at the [[British Museum]] as "[[Wikipedia:GLAM/BM|Wikipedian in Residence]] (see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-03-15/News_and_notes#Wikipedian-in-Residence at the British Museum|earlier ''Signpost'' coverage]]). Around 40 Wikimedians joined him last Friday for a "[http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Backstage_Pass Backstage Pass]" event, consisting of private tours of some of the museum's public and non-public areas, followed by discussions and on-wiki collaboration with the staff. The New York Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/arts/design/05wiki.html covered] the event at length, explaining that the British Museum's motivation to collaborate with Wikipedia is "to help ensure that the museum’s expertise and notable artifacts are reflected in that digital reference’s pages". The article noted that museums and Wikipedia have as their common interest "educating the public: one has the artifacts and expertise, and the other has the online audience", but also mentioned possible conflicts, recalling the legal threats issued last year by the [[National Portrait Gallery]] against a Commons user who had uploaded high-resolution scans of public domain images from their collection (see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-07-13/Copyright threat|''Signpost'' coverage]]. As [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-June/058731.html remarked] last week by Mike Godwin, the NPG "did not press any legal challenge" subsequently.) Among the results of the tour are [[:commons:Category:Backstage Pass at the British Museum|photos]] and [http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Backstage_Pass#Results_of_the_day newly created articles] about the British Museum's artefacts, including several DYK nominations. |
||
===Hiding of interlanguage links debated=== |
===Hiding of interlanguage links debated=== |
||
Revision as of 21:44, 7 June 2010
headline
"Pending Changes" (formerly Flagged Protection) trial to begin on June 14
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/198354
Foundation hires two new chief officers
[1] foundation:Press_releases/June_2010_Wikimedia_Foundation_appoints_new_CCO_and_CGDO_QandA
British Museum gives "backstage pass" to Wikipedians
Last week, User:Witty lama began his five week stay at the British Museum as "Wikipedian in Residence (see earlier Signpost coverage). Around 40 Wikimedians joined him last Friday for a "Backstage Pass" event, consisting of private tours of some of the museum's public and non-public areas, followed by discussions and on-wiki collaboration with the staff. The New York Times covered the event at length, explaining that the British Museum's motivation to collaborate with Wikipedia is "to help ensure that the museum’s expertise and notable artifacts are reflected in that digital reference’s pages". The article noted that museums and Wikipedia have as their common interest "educating the public: one has the artifacts and expertise, and the other has the online audience", but also mentioned possible conflicts, recalling the legal threats issued last year by the National Portrait Gallery against a Commons user who had uploaded high-resolution scans of public domain images from their collection (see Signpost coverage. As remarked last week by Mike Godwin, the NPG "did not press any legal challenge" subsequently.) Among the results of the tour are photos and newly created articles about the British Museum's artefacts, including several DYK nominations.
Hiding of interlanguage links debated
heated discussion on Foundation-l [2]
usability:Opinion Language Links http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-June/058934.html
Briefly
- In an essay titled Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia, Wikipedians Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller and Jon Beasley-Murray examine the relationship between Wikipedia and academic teaching. All three are scholars at U.S. universities who have worked with their students on Wikipedia assignments (see also the 2008 Signpost interview about Beasley-Murray's "Murder Madness and Mayhem" project). The essay was written in the context of a roundtable titled "2010 A New Frontier: Teaching with Wikipedia" at the 2010 "Writing Across the Curriculum" conference last month.
- Voting on the finalists for the Picture of the Year 2009 contest on Wikimedia Commons is open until 11 June, 23:59 (UTC).
Discuss this story
Pending changes trial
How does one get reviewer rights?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Foundation hires
I must say if Wikipedia started advertising I would consider going somewhere else. It seems that currently fiances are okay so hopefully this will never happen. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
British Museum
About [3]: I do think that the existence of the article Wikipedian in Residence is a fact that might interest Signpost readers, many of whom are Wikipedians. However, rereading the previous wording I understand Liam's concern that it might give the wrong impression that he had created that article himself. Hopefully the new wording avoids that misunderstanding. Regards, HaeB (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interwiki links
To me, the problem is not that some of those links are hidden (I'm surprised the controversy is over the language links rather than the Toolbox ones, though), but rather that every time my session times out I've got to re-expand the dang list. I don't mind doing it once, but I use "What links here" quite frequently and don't care to have the list hidden by default. Powers T 17:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) It's hard not to see how the handling of this unwanted change to the default skin as a symptom of an increasingly top-down approach to the Wikimedia communities -- which is directly against the process which has made Wikipedia & related projects so successful. I don't like where that is taking us. -- llywrch (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's odd to me. Seems like a solution in need of a problem. Why not just make it a setting under preferences so that an editor can choose based on his or her frequency of use? I personally almost never use them, but sometimes, if I see that FA star, I might check it out to see how it compares to the English article. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 18:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Of Monobook and Vector users, 0.95% and 0.28% clicked on the language links " This does immediately show that Vector decreases the number of interwiki clicks by about 3/4 - in other words makes them less usable. If a limited list of languages is displayed, then it needs to be content driven, or at least content drivable - articles about Farsi should display the Farsi link. Certainly weight should be given to displaying FAs in other languages, especially where the home language article is not featured. Rich Farmbrough, 08:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]
A small addendum: Following Erik Möller's proposal cited at the end of the story, a page has now been set up on meta to "capture ideas on how the User Experience Team and the Wikipedia Community can collaboratively approach Product Development": meta:Product Development Process Ideas.
Regards, HaeB (talk) 11:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add that it shouldn't be all about the click-through ratio. Sometimes just hovering the cursor over an inter-language link (to see where it leads) is all that's needed. This kind of use is not represented by the click-through ratio at all.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 10, 2010; 14:38 (UTC)
Chapter-selected seats
As phoebe has a byline in this part, I want to note that the little update on Chapter-selected board seats has not been written by her. (She does take conflict of interest concerns quite seriously.)
Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]