Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/Features and admins: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m link this too
removing my name and my work.
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-header|||}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-header|||}}</noinclude>


{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-start|{{{1|Featured article milestone: 3,000}}}|By [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]], [[User:Tony1|Tony1]], and [[User:Resident Mario|Resident Mario]]|30 August 2010}}
{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-start|{{{1|Featured article milestone: 3,000}}}|By [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]], [[User:Tony1|Tony1]]|30 August 2010}}


[[File:Benjamin_West_-_William_Woollett_-_The_Battle_at_La_Hogue.jpg|thumb|center|510px|New featured picture: a high-quality copy of a large steel engraving by the 18th-century English engraver [[William Woollett]], ''The Battle at La Hogue'', after a painting by [[Benjamin West]] (1781). The image probably shows [[Action at La Hogue (1692)|the events of 24 May 1692]], when the British sailors rowed in and torched French ships.]]
[[File:Benjamin_West_-_William_Woollett_-_The_Battle_at_La_Hogue.jpg|thumb|center|510px|New featured picture: a high-quality copy of a large steel engraving by the 18th-century English engraver [[William Woollett]], ''The Battle at La Hogue'', after a painting by [[Benjamin West]] (1781). The image probably shows [[Action at La Hogue (1692)|the events of 24 May 1692]], when the British sailors rowed in and torched French ships.]]


===3,000th featured article===
===3,000th featured article===
On 18 August, the English Wikipedia reached a milestone with the promotion of its 3,000th article to [[WP:FA|Featured article]] (FA) status.
On 18 August, the English Wikipedia reached a milestone with the promotion of its 3,000th article to [[WP:FA|Featured article]] (FA) status. These 3,000 articles represent the best 0.09% of articles on Wikipedia—about one in every 1,120 articles. The threshold was reached when FAC delegate [[User:SandyGeorgia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_articles&curid=5921878&diff=379504452&oldid=379493133 simultaneously promoted] six articles, bringing the total to 3,001 articles. These articles were on a wide variety of topics: [[Whitechapel murders]] (11 murders in London between 1888 and 1891 by the notorious Jack the Ripper); [[Royal National College for the Blind]] (a residential college for the blind); [[Mount Cayley volcanic field]] (a volcanic field in Canada); "[[Road to the Multiverse]]" (a ''Family Guy'' episode); [[90377 Sedna]] (a trans-Neptunian object orbiting the Sun); and [[Mark Tonelli]] (a retired Australian competitive swimmer).

The [[WP:FAC|Featured article process]] (FAC) was initiated in June 2003 as "Brilliant prose"; we reached 500 FAs in February 2005 (see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-02-07/500 featured articles|''Signpost'' coverage]]); the 1,000th FA was promoted in June 2006 ([[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2006-06-12/Thousandth_FA|''Signpost'' coverage]]); the 2,000th was reached just under two years later ([[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-04-14/Dispatches|''Signpost'' coverage]]). The deterioration over time of individual FAs and rising standards for promotion have meant that many early articles have been [[WP:FAR|demoted]]; the number of FAs (promotions less demotions) has [[Wikipedia:Featured article statistics|risen]] at an average rate of 34 articles a month from August 2008 to July 2010. In the first half of this year, 270 articles were promoted, and 70 were demoted, a rise of 200 articles or about 33 articles monthly.


===Administrators===
===Administrators===

Revision as of 18:04, 31 August 2010

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

Wow, interesting choice of editor for the FA choice of the week (from de?). I like it. Way to think outside the box! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremely, extremely dissapointed at the liberal, unapproved lynching of my writing, and at the direction the Signpost is taking with it. ResMar 18:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed what little of my writing was included. In the future I demand I be notified of such major desecration. ResMar 18:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Um, yes it is? oO ResMar 19:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I just pointed out the same thing at WT:POST, just with a less elegant link ;) Regards, HaeB (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Readers should know about WP:FCDW/3000. ResMar 18:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, for anyone who wonders: What happened was that ResMar wrote up summaries of several featured articles in a draft for the milestone story which were not included because these had already been summarized in last week's F&A, in an attempt to avoid duplicate coverage. The other part of the draft (authored by him and, see above, other users) was included here by Tony1.
Regards, HaeB (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And now back to our regularly scheduled programming :) Congratulations to all the nominators and reviewers who contributed to reaching the 3,000 FA milestone on Wiki! I also note that FAC has reached a two-year high on monthly promotions, in spite of increasing standards, and congratulate all of the dedicated contributors-- both writers and reviewers. We can always use more reviewers (without reviewers, we don't have FAs): see Reviewers achieving excellence for ways anyone can help out! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok for anyone who wonders: Said actions consisted of a shoddy copy & paste job that minorized a major Wikipedia event (3000 FAs) in favor of "avoiding duplication." As such the question becomes, "What duplication?" and "Why was there no such issue in the past?" ResMar 19:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too would like to congratulate everyone involved in creating and improving everything mentioned on this page. And celebrate the fact of 3,000 FAs. Hooray for us! --bodnotbod (talk) 00:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose so. You might want to read the real 3000 post, it's not quite finished but at least it provides some context. ResMar 01:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I continue to miss the complete gallery of WP:FPs.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As has been pointed out by others here, a gallery renders the pics in very small size: you effectively need to click on each. This week, we included this advice at the top of the featured picture section: "Each can be viewed in medium size by clicking on "nom"." Do you not think that is the ideal way to access the material? Tony (talk) 04:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

congrats

Congrats to all on the 3,000th FA; and a note to say that I really like the new style of the Features & Admins section, especially the brief bios of the new admins and the "pick of the week." Very nice! And Resmar, don't take editing personally -- the Signpost runs as a newspaper, which means material isn't duplicated from week to week and the editor in chief's job is to help ensure this and make sure the whole issue is coherent. Bottom line, they may choose not to include things or rewrite them. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 05:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the stance that the signpost is going to take, then you might as well close Dispatches up and mark it as historical. For some reason, these milestones were worthy of a major news story 4 times before, but aren't now. It's very dissapointing and highly unfriendly. ResMar 16:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
also from the german wikipedia I want to congratulate you for the 3,000 featured articles - I posted a small passage on this in our Kurier to spread it to our german contributors. Thx a lot to all of you involved as authors, reviewers, ... of this process. Cheers, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Achim! Tony (talk) 23:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hungry Lucy

I love that album which was released under CC-by-SA, it is absolutely magnificent. And I would never have heard of it if it wasn't for the Signpost, so thank you very much! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 23:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]