Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Boneyard/Blank page 016: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:09, 31 August 2010

To Do

ResMar, please ping in each nominator to have them review content. Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed in the Newsroom, all the articles presented here were already presented in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-23/Features and admins. Even if the descriptions there were somewhat shorter, I don't think it is very fortunate that our readers get told about the same featured articles twice in a row. It would be good if this dispatch would tell more about the history and state of the FA process itself, like Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-06-12/Thousandth FA. Are there current versions of the graphs at WP:FAS (which were also used in the 2000th FA dispatch)?

Regards, HaeB (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge, those graphs were maintained by someone on the German Wiki, and have long gone without update. I agree that we should tell more about how the FAC process has evolved since the 2,000th promotion, and see no need to describe specific artiles anywhere (either here or on Features and admins, but YMMV). At any rate, the 3,000th articles do deserve more mention than our weekly promotions. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the relevant bits to F and A, and put Mario's name as co-author. This page now need not run. Tony (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:54, 30 August 2010 edit SandyGeorgia (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 273,448 edits →‎To Do: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:09, 31 August 2010 edit undo Tony1 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 265,579 edits →‎To Do: Not to do Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	: To my knowledge, those graphs were maintained by someone on the German Wiki, and have long gone without update. I agree that we should tell more about how the FAC process has evolved since the 2,000th promotion, and see no need to describe specific artiles anywhere (either here or on Features and admins, but YMMV). At any rate, the 3,000th articles do deserve more mention than our weekly promotions. [[User:SandyGeorgia\|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia\|Talk]]) 22:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)		: To my knowledge, those graphs were maintained by someone on the German Wiki, and have long gone without update. I agree that we should tell more about how the FAC process has evolved since the 2,000th promotion, and see no need to describe specific artiles anywhere (either here or on Features and admins, but YMMV). At any rate, the 3,000th articles do deserve more mention than our weekly promotions. [[User:SandyGeorgia\|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia\|Talk]]) 22:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
			::I've added the relevant bits to F and A, and put Mario's name as co-author. This page now need not run. [[User:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 03:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)