Status quo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Status quo is a Latin phrase meaning the existing state of affairs, particularly with regard to social, political, religious, scientific or military issues.[1] In the sociological sense, the status quo refers to the current state of social structure or values.[2] With regard to policy debate, it means how conditions are contrasted with a possible change. For example: "The countries are now trying to maintain the status quo with regard to their nuclear arsenals." To maintain the status quo is to keep things the way they presently are.

The related phrase status quo ante, literally 'the status before', refers to the state of affairs that existed previously.[3]

Political usage[edit]

Via social movements the status quo may be overhauled. These seek to alleviate or prevent a particular issue and often to shape social feeling and cultural expression of a society or nation.[4] The status quo is at least in part rejected by their protagonists – progressives – leading the movement.[5]

Advocating to improve the status quo is a persuasive rhetorical device. This is sometimes critiqued as a policy of deliberate ambiguity as not formalizing or defining the adverse situation.

In democratic meetings, a casting vote will often be subject to a custom that is cast per the status quo, the heart of Speaker Denison's rule. Clark Kerr reportedly said: "The status quo is the only solution that cannot be vetoed."[6]

Karl Marx viewed organized religion as a means for the bourgeoisie to keep the proletariat content with an unequal status quo.[7]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "status quo". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary.
  2. ^ C. Michael Botterweck. "Glossary for Sociology 100". academics.triton.edu. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  3. ^ "status quo ante". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary.
  4. ^ Clark, Pamela (2000). "The Social Climate". The Optimal Environment: Part Four. www.featherpicking.com. Retrieved 2009-03-11.
  5. ^ "Status Quo - Dictionary Definition". vocabulary.com. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  6. ^ Seymour, Daniel (2015-12-07). Momentum: The Responsibility Paradigm and Virtuous Cycles of Change in Colleges and Universities. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781475821048.
  7. ^ "Religion and Social Control". Boundless Sociology. Boundless. 27 Jun 2014. Archived from the original on Jan 8, 2015. Retrieved 8 Feb 2015.