Talk:Koha (software)

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kohalogo-w.png[edit]

Image:Kohalogo-w.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Achieving NPOV[edit]

Openly (talk) 12:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC) I've added a bit of context to the history section, but wanted to comment on the general tone of the article- if others agree, please edit. The description sounds as if cut and paste from a marketing presentation; a summary from one of the many article comparing advantages and disadvantages of other FOSS ILS systems would make the article more useful. The list of ILS systems seems out of place; a templated table to place on all the ILS system articles would fit Wikipedia better. The listing of git repository statistics also seems excessive and should be removed.[reply]

Improvements needed[edit]

Here are some improvements that should happen (none of which risk point-of-view issues and so can be done by members of the koha community) Stuartyeates (talk) 21:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding some screenshots (see Google search for examples of what makes a good screenshot and how they can be worked into the article). I'll admit to being unsure how images are actaully uploaded.
Expand references, using Template:Cite_web in most cases. For explanation of why this is important see Wikipedia:Link rot
Updating version numbers and dates when new versions are released (seems to be happening fairly reliably)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Koha (software) → Koha (koha-community.org software) — These two pages are about forks of a software project. Both groups call their software by the same name (one group coined the name, the other has the US trademark on it). The move is a step towards clarity and resolving persistent POV issues with these articles (see their histories). Once the communities have clearly separate pages hopefully POV issues will abate. The new names were chosen with regard to WP:PRECISE and the fact that their respective domains are the least-loaded and least-controversial descriptions I could come up with, as per WP:POVTITLE. After the move Koha (software) should redirect to the Koha disambiguation page and LibLime should be a redirect to Koha (koha.org software). After the move someone will need to: add a hatnote to each of the articles pointing to the other; update the Koha disambiguation; trawl through and update various redirects in place at the moment. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LibLime → Koha (koha.org software)

Correction LibLime / PTFS / koha.org has the koha trademark in the USA with the serial number 77586112 filed on October 6, 2008. Horowhenua Library Trust / koha-community.org has the koha trademark in the EU number 007350135 filed in France on 28/01/2005. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as is Koha is software, Liblime is a company. 140.203.154.5 (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose moves. The proposed names are creative but have no basis in policy; The existing names are however quite compliant. Andrewa (talk) 05:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recognise that the names are somewhat unusual, but WP:PRECISE requires them to be able to distinguish the two groups of people building diverging pieces of software. Neither of the two who oppose the moves have suggested how these groups might be clearly named nor made useful suggestions about how to avoid the long-running POV issues with these pages. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Conferences in history?[edit]

Should the international conferences be added into the existing history section, or in a new Conferences section? Dates, locations and links at the very least. Sekjal (talk) 17:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Koha (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Koha (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Risks?[edit]

I've just reverted the following from an Indian IP:

The software source code is free. However the deployment effort is not free and requires libraries to budget for deployment cost.
Customization of Koha for your own organization requires that library staff spend time or money to customize it.
Integration with other systems like College Administration Software, Accounting Software etc. is a challenge and it requires paid support.
The regular operation and maintenance of Koha expects that librarians have some system administration capability.
Absence of one owner for Koha makes it difficult for any one software company to own the issues and commit to fix within an SLA. when problems arise.

I've considered whether some point are worth keeping - but while all of it is true, it's hare to believe that any of this is news to any but the most naive. - Snori (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

>>> Not able to find enough justification as to why these are removed. What I have written are truth. People do face these difficulties. Please modify if necessary but create a section called Risks portion. Make the article fair by giving a true picture whether positive or negative. Removing the risks portion is unjust. BangaloreWiki. 7th Jan 2018

These are related to open source software in general, not just Koha. Therefore it should not be part of this page. 91.156.244.41 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need help for a clean reference for Turkey's Koha installation infos[edit]

The source for the updated item and user counts are from https://kohapakistan.org/ in the carousel. But within few months the video won't be here anymore. The video is archived on https://web.archive.org but having it in it's context would be much cleaner. The video isn't viewable in the archived version of kohapakistan.org --Tuxayo (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]