Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Spotlight cleanup listing/Images

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FAs[edit]

Inclusion?[edit]

Witchfinder General[edit]

  • File:OgilvyDwyer.jpg, located in plot section, screenshot
    Appears decorative, remove? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. Will remove.Hal Raglan (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:ConquerorLobbyCard.jpg, located in response section, poster
    Shows alternate title for U.S. release, don't think its necessary for inclusion. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Disagree. Supports extremely detailed critical commentary on the film, per Wikipedia's guidelines and custom, and vividly illustrates for the reader the U.S. release marketing campaign, which is also detailed in the text of the section.Hal Raglan (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    However, its inclusion just shows the card and the different title. For an image like this to be included, there would need to be commentary about card itself (Did reviewers criticize/commend it as compared to the original poster? or Was the marketing question on the side of the card focused on at all?). There should be some indication for why we are looking to this image, instead of just a poster with the title. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    It appears to me that you are suggesting that an image of the US release film poster would be acceptable as a replacement for the lobby card image currently in the article. I will make the replacement.Hal Raglan (talk) 22:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    The type of image isn't the issue, but what content it's supposed to be supporting. I wouldn't have a problem with it if there was another line or two in the caption maybe focusing on the significance of the name change. Many films usually have alternate titles in foreign releases, but if the caption could clarify why it was important here, it would be great to keep the image there. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Witchfinder.jpg, located in Home video versions section, DVD cover
    Appears decorative, remove? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. Although it helps illustrate the film's complicated video release history, I will remove.Hal Raglan (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope[edit]

  • File:Leiadeathstar.jpg, located in cast section, screenshot
    Currently used to show cast members. Could it be used to illustrate costume design instead? Otherwise, this one should probably be removed. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Shows multiple lead characters, essential information about any narrative movie. No overlap with other images from film. Fully meets letter and spirit of policy and guideline.—DCGeist (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Palpatine[edit]

  • File:Palpatine1.jpg, located in Prequel trilogy section, screenshot
    This may be helpful for illustrating younger view of character before later becoming deformed, but also could be seen as decorative. Thoughts? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:PalpatineCloneWar.JPG, located in 2003 animated series section, screenshot
    Probably don't need an image of him in every medium. Possibly include this one or the one below of the comic? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Swhde16 bg.JPG, located in Star Wars literature section, comic strip panel
    Probably don't need an image of him in every medium. Possibly include this one or the one above of him in the TV show? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Karl Rove Cartoon.JPG, located in popular culture section, screenshot
    A few sentences talk about the character, but not of the design/costume. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Night of the Living Dead[edit]

Richard III[edit]

Jabba the Hutt[edit]

Halloween III: Season of the Witch[edit]

Halloween II[edit]

Halloween[edit]

Tenebrae[edit]

  • File:TenebraeNightmare.jpg, located in "Aberrant" sexuality section, screenshot
    Used for discussing sexuality, but free image of actress would seem to be able to replace this. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep - I don't agree. The discussion of aberrant sexuality in the article specifically relates to Tenebrae and the use of the ambiguous male/female in this role plays an important part in the film's narrative and thematic concerns. Using a generic free photo of the actress (if any exist) would not serve any purpose, and in fact to me would be merely decorative.Hal Raglan (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    The use of a free image could technically be decorative since we don't have to worry about copyright issues. However for this screenshot, it just shows a woman looking towards the camera. Its use here doesn't really convey anything about the ""Aberrant" sexuality" section. If a screenshot could be found for one of the scenes described in the section, that would have a stronger rationale for allowing the image. Otherwise, it just looks like we're including an image to say "Look, she's sexy" which seems decorative in this use. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    But the image in question is a screenshot taken from one of the scenes described in the section, depicting the character about to be murdered in one of the film's flashbacks. I'll change the caption to make this more clear.-Hal Raglan (talk) 01:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset Boulevard[edit]

Our Gang[edit]

Batman[edit]

Numerous non-free images. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article contains 16 images, 15 of which are non-free, one a diagram is in Commons.
The article includes two images both by artist Jim Lee. At least one of those should go, and I think the image used in the infobox is a very representative image of Batman and it would be a shame to lose it.
Although it seems sensible to reuse images once they are included in Wikipedia already that is not the reality I have seen in other articles, and the standard should be applied consistently. There is no real need to include the Frank Miller Dark Knight cover image in the main Batman article. The third image by Jim Lee showing Batmans enemies also seems like a smart bit of reuse but similarly incompatible with the strict interpretation of the image policy I've experienced.
Maybe I'm missing some important subtlety but the image of Dick Grayson as Batman doesn't seem distinctly different enough to belong in the Batman article but it would seem easier to justify in the Dick Grayson article (which incidentally has two images of Chris O'Donnell as Robin, when it seems like only one would be needed).
The painted image by Alex Ross, the Batman Animated series image, and the Michael Keaton, as the first film Batman, are all particularly strong images. I'd suggest they be last on the list of any images to be removed, each being representative of large parts of the Batman style (comic/television, film, animation, respectively).
Fundamentally I don't think removing any of these images will make the article better - I'd encourage the better editors to make sure to improve the article before removing any images that compensate for weak text - but if this article shouldn't be exempt from the rules being applied severely and strictly applied elsewhere. -- Horkana (talk) 01:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red vs. Blue[edit]

Resolved[edit]

The Cat and the Canary[edit]

Image removed from the article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord of the Rings[edit]

Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz the Cat[edit]

Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic Park[edit]

  • File:JurassicParkcast.jpg, located in cast section, screenshot
    Currently used to show cast members. Probably should be removed. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Most of those actors have free images on their pages. No reason to use a NFI. Remove. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove, all living people looking like themselves so no justification for using a non-free image. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:ClayRex.jpg, located in production section, screenshot
    This would probably be more helpful if a video sample was used instead. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove per above. Nothing to gain from this image. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove still image doesn't illustrate the concept mentioned in the caption, leaving it as purely decorative. Agree with Nehrams that having a short video clip might be more justifiable, and a better illustration of the topic. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:JurassicPark-FilmRexCarPin02.jpg, located in Dinosaurs on screen section, screenshot
    Appears decorative, remove? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    So-so on this. I believe the Fair use rationale suffices for this one. Keep —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove purely decorative. Doesn't really enhance the readers understanding of the use of animitronics, nor of this particular one. No different from the scene in the film, except for being able to actually see the crew. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Jurassic Park screenshot 2.jpg, located in legacy section, screenshot
    Used to illustrate scene that was used for magazine ranking, kind of a toss-up for me. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove Not a very appealing image. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove unnecessary illustration and purely decorative. A screenshot is not necessary to illustrate the statement, and a still image alone can't adequately show the "magical moment" being mentioned. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mummy[edit]

  • File:Mummymovie1.jpg, located in cast section, screenshot
    Currently used to show cast members. Could it be used to illustrate costume design instead? Otherwise, this one should probably be removed. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see were costume design is talked about in the article. Also don't see anything unique about their costume. Remove. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed with Mike. If no information can be added, this picture is just here to show off the cast. My votes for remove. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove I do not think this image meets WP:NONFREE as it illustrates living people who do not look significantly different from "normal" (so replaceable by free) and there seems to be no demonstrable coverage on the costume design in the film that might justify such an image. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zodiac (film)[edit]

Casino Royale[edit]

  • File:GunBarrelPhoto.jpg, located in effect section, screenshot
    Opening isn't discussed in effects section, perhaps one could be added about the title opening instead? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Probably keep is the modified opening is discussed. If not, remove. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    RemoveThe opening is only briefly discussed, and it doesn't appear to be a concept that cannot be adequately described in words. If kept, the caption needs sourcing or something as the phrase used there is not used in the article. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Pit and the Pendulum[edit]

  • File:PitCap.jpg, located in plot section, screenshot
    Appears decorative, remove? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I can't tell that he's "mad" in that image. Unneeded. Remove. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove. Price looks more exhausted. No real information otherwise. Remove. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove purely decorative and does not illustrate any concept or idea not already better described in words. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove - Although I am the editor who originally added the image to the article, the arguments above are pretty persuasive, especially the one from AnmaFinotera. I will remove this shortly.Hal Raglan (talk) 17:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coonskin[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mom and Dad[edit]

  • File:Babbpressbook-b.jpeg, located in Marketing and presentation section, book cover
    A pressbook is briefly discussed in the section, but showing the cover doesn't seem to assist in the reader's understanding. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove per above. —Mike Allen 07:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove, cover is not necessary to assist reader in understanding that a press book was released, and general preference is not to use a non-free book cover image outside of its own article. 04:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
    Comment Any possibility this might be Public Domain? Oh, but who gives a fuck, this is a Project Deletion discussion. Happy Editing! Dekkappai (talk) 06:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm sure that we do care if it could be public domain, as if that were the case, we would have this non-free image converted over to a free image. Do you have reason to believe that it is in the public domain (seeing that the film is from 1949)? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lage Raho Munna Bhai[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back[edit]

Cannibal Holocaust[edit]

Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B movie[edit]

  • File:PiranhaPosterA.jpg, located in The golden age of exploitation: 1970s section, poster
    Caption comments on similarity to Jaws, but would probably need more detailed caption covering the similarity to the poster of Jaws. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. Have added such discussion to caption, along with citation.—DCGeist (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:BloodSimplePoster.jpg, located in Decline of the B: 1980s section, poster
    The style of the film is commented on, so a screenshot may be more helpful than a movie poster in this case. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. Will seek out appropriate screenshot and report back within a few days.—DCGeist (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Image of poster replaced with exemplary screenshot. Sourced discussion added.—DCGeist (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Primer.jpg, located in Transition II/The B movie in the digital age: 2000s section, poster
    The use of the poster isn't helpful for describing the film for this sectio. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Disagree. Supports detailed critical commentary on film, per our guideline and custom.—DCGeist (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    On the other hand...this has inspired an improvement. Image of poster replaced with exemplary screenshot. Sourced discussion added.—DCGeist (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Latter Days[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summer of '42[edit]

Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November[edit]

  • File:November film poster 2.jpg, located in Promotion and reception section, poster
    Appears decorative, remove? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I added this image to the article back in 2005, when the approach to fair use images on Wikipedia was very different. I see no compelling reason to keep it. If I'm being honest, the whole article probably isn't up to today's FA standard (and I speak here as the individual who wrote the bulk of it)... but that's a separate concern entirely. x Extraordinary Machine (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Convenience store robbery in November.jpg, located in development section, screenshot
    Screenshot has character's facing away from camera looking at person running away, doesn't seem that helpful. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Same as above. Take it away... :) x Extraordinary Machine (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blade Runner[edit]

Images removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs source/resizing/FUR[edit]

GAs[edit]

Inclusion?[edit]

Spider-Man[edit]

Willow[edit]

  • File:Willowraz.jpg, located in visual effects section, screenshot
    Probably could use better caption detailing the use of visual effects. --Happy editing!

Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Remove. It appears to be simply decorative. Text does not suggest the effect well enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum of Solace[edit]

Dracula's Daughter[edit]

  • File:Ddlili.jpg, located in Lesbian implications section, screenshot of two characters
  • Keep - for identification and critical commentary of an important historical image, the first known inclusion of the lesbian vampire trope in film. Otto4711 (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moonraker[edit]

Only the zero g image should be kept, displays how the wires were setup. I found it helpful to visual what they were talking about. --Peppagetlk 18:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back to the Future[edit]

Alien[edit]

  • File:Alien (1979) - main cast.jpg, located in cast section, publicity shot of characters
      • Keep: The article's GA review found no issue with the images. A subsequent FA review found that the images used "are well integrated in the text, are used to illustrate points that could not be easily described with text alone, the usage seems consistant with WP:NFCC, and by extension featured article criteria three." The cast image passes the non-free content criteria as the "Casting" section specifically discusses (via sourced critical commentary) how the ages and sexes of the actors added to the look, feel, and effectiveness of the film. The image significantly enhances understanding of these points, as the "look" of the characters cannot be described in words alone. --IllaZilla (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dark Knight[edit]

Kung Fu Panda[edit]

A Month in the Country[edit]

Independence Day[edit]

Escape from New York[edit]

Forbidden Zone[edit]

*Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith[edit]

Catch Me If You Can[edit]

The Incredible Hulk[edit]

The Big Lebowski[edit]

Marilena from P7[edit]

The first one could probably be removed. The second picture I would recommend keeping since it shows the conditions in which the filming too place. The third one could probably also get removed, but some may argue that it is relevant in order to show the split screen effect that was used. - Diego_pmc Talk 14:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Primer[edit]

Granpa[edit]

A Hard Day's Night[edit]

  • Keep - article passed WP:GA with this image two years ago; the image is of historical importance since George Harrison met his future wife Patti Boyd on the set, and the image shows one of their earliest encounters. All this is addressed in the article text. Rodhullandemu 16:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You Only Live Twice[edit]

Batman: Mask of the Phantasm[edit]

Diamonds Are Forever[edit]

Dor[edit]

American Graffiti[edit]

Solaris[edit]

Remove, I say. Far too many nonfree images here. Staecker (talk) 12:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. and Mrs. Iyer[edit]

Randall Flagg[edit]

    • Keep
    File:FlaggMovieSheridan.jpg is the only time where the character has appeared in a film adaptation
    File:Walter o'Dim.PNG is significant in that the character has two different personas and that Walter is the definitive one at the end of the Dark Tower series. Up until a certain point he was an entirely different character in different books by King until King combined the two, which drastically altered the character of Flagg and his importance in the series. It's a very significant part of Flagg's character history and his publication history as to how the character evolved over the years in King's different novels.--CyberGhostface (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji[edit]

The World Is Not Enough[edit]

When Harry Met Sally...[edit]

Lagaan[edit]

The Iron Giant[edit]

Thunderball[edit]

Sleepy Hollow[edit]

Anand[edit]

Friday the 13th (franchise)[edit]

  • File:F13Variety.jpg, located in development section, advertisement
    • Keep - there is an entire section of critical commentary devoted to this specific advertisement that appeared in Variety back in 1979. It discusses both the impact the ad had as well as specific details of how Cunningham wanted the ad to look in order to create a buzz for the film.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace[edit]

The Living Daylights[edit]

Casino Royale[edit]

A View to a Kill[edit]

Die Another Day[edit]

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest[edit]

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix[edit]

The Spy Who Loved Me[edit]

The Rocky Horror Picture Show[edit]

  • Keep The image has been moved from the plot section to the production section where critical commentary on the image is discussed. The image provides an illustation on the returning production members from the original london production by depicting the returning actor, costume designs by the returning designer aswell as production design by the returning artist. The fair use rational has been clarified to meet Fair use standards and it is believed the image now meets standards.--Amadscientist (talk) 08:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Octopussy[edit]

Memento[edit]

Mulan[edit]

Raiders of the Lost Ark[edit]

From Russia with Love[edit]

Pan's Labyrinth[edit]

I Not Stupid[edit]

Minority Report[edit]

Cinematic style of Abbas Kiarostami[edit]

Cool World[edit]

Tomorrow Never Dies[edit]

GoldenEye[edit]

Resolved[edit]

Hairspray[edit]

Titanic[edit]

Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow[edit]

Down and Dirty Duck[edit]

The Usual Suspects[edit]

Who Framed Roger Rabbit[edit]

  • File:Judgedoom.PNG, located in plot section, screenshot of two characters
    Moved to filming section which talks about the animated/live-action filming. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bound[edit]

Beyond the Sea[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Frighteners[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rocketeer[edit]

  • File:LotharCliff.jpg, located in plot section, screenshot of two characters
    Remove. It appears to be simply decorative. It's not even a great picture of these characters. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 39 Steps[edit]

Image removed from article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Batman in film[edit]

  • Lacking any images, are any available that can support one of the sections in the article? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Added image of Michael Keaton as Batman that was already included in Batman article. -- Horkana (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Change it. Better to use Michael Keaton image that shows torso and batsuit not just his mask and face. Reuse image from Batman (1989 film). -- Horkana (talk) 01:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Nightmare Before Christmas[edit]

Image already deleted. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parineeta[edit]

Image already deleted. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Prestige[edit]

Needs source/resizing/FUR[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Spotlight_cleanup_listing/Images&oldid=1184877106"