Topic on Talk:Article feedback

It may be a good idea to fix some of the bugs before deploying the AFT.

http://i.imgur.com/KHa0h.jpg

The words "gaps" and "optional" are in the same spot. Please avoid making the AFT even bigger.

(FF v5.0, default text size)

http://i.imgur.com/vOreG.jpg

(Chrome 12.0.742.112, default text size)

The rest of the bugs can be found here: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&list_id=16547&component=ArticleFeedback&resolution=---

Rollout is beginning today (within about three hours, I think), in increments of 5,000 articles. So there won't be time to address bugs before then.

However, we can (and will) address many design concerns in future iterations, post-deployment.

Thanks Wasbeer for pointing out this bug and logging it bugzilla with all of the relevant details on your system environment. This is very helpful.

This post was posted by Howief (WMF), but signed as Howief.

Two things:

• I think it's irresponsible (and a little arrogant) to deploy a tool with known bugs and with considerate objections from users.
• I am yet to be convinced you have community support for deploying this on the English Wikipedia. Can you please supply me with a link to the source of your strongest argument that you have this support?

This is not a showstopper bug.

I'm working with Dario on putting together some of the most recent research, which will be published shortly. In the meantime, here are some links to quantitative research and qualitative research.

This post was posted by Howief (WMF), but signed as Howief.

Fair enough. Not a showstopper bug. But the links you supplied were not the link I asked for.

I'm working with Dario on putting together some of the most recent research, which will be published shortly. In the meantime, here are some links to quantitative research and qualitative research.

Please be patient :)

This post was posted by Howief (WMF), but signed as Howief.

I doubt the research will contain evidence of support of the AFT from the community of editors on enwp (which is what I'm asking for), but sure, I'll be patient. :-)