Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship/Bluegoblin7: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:10, 19 July 2010

Bluegoblin7

On hold for 48 hours and close date shifted. Jon@talk:~$ 19:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All !votes cleared per the fact that "emotions may soar" (see below). Please revert me if you disagree and bring it to the talk page of this RfDA. Chenzw Talk 15:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is preserved as a request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship that has been placed on hold by a bureaucrat pending a decision as to the outcome. Please do not modify the text. The result of the discussion will be posted soon.

Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs)

RfdA of Bluegoblin7

global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted blocks · protects · deletes · moves · rights
Last comment by: Chenzw.

End date: 26 JUL 2010

BG7 has been desysopped for Wheel warring as an emergency measure. I'm asking to community to remove his rights permanent. Also blocking a user where he was involved in an editorial dispute. Reference this block log where BG7 re applied a block in contravention of our policy against administrative wheel warring. I've also included some background here on this permalink of BG7's talk page. We don't do this here. Jon@talk:~$ 18:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Deadminship

Oppose Deadminship

Comments

As a matter of courtesy, I'd advocate postponing this, until he is able to comment. --Eptalon (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copy over whatever he needs copied from his talk page, or set up a transclusion trick to do it. Jon@talk:~$ 18:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to shift the whole by two days. Events just happened, and emotions may soar. This is about serious business, where emotions should not affect our decision. --Eptalon (talk) 19:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sane, place it on hold for 48 hours and shift the close date. Jon@talk:~$ 19:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ===Bluegoblin7===
 '''On hold''' for 48 hours and close date shifted.  [[User:NonvocalScream|Jon]]@[[User Talk:NonvocalScream|talk]]:~$ 19:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
+:All !votes cleared per the fact that "emotions may soar" (see below). Please revert me if you disagree '''and''' bring it to the [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for deadminship/Bluegoblin7|talk page]] of this RfDA. [[User:Chenzw|<span style="color:#006600">Chenzw</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size="1">[[User_talk:Chenzw|<span style="color:#006600">Talk</span>]]</font>&nbsp; 15:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 <div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: 	#ffffe0; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 :''The following discussion is preserved as a [[Wikipedia:requests for adminship|request for adminship]], [[Wikipedia:requests for bureaucratship|request for bureaucratship]], [[Wikipedia:requests for checkusership|request for checkusership]], or [[Wikipedia:Requests for oversightship|request for oversightship]] that has been placed '''on hold''' by a [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] pending a decision as to the outcome. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify the text.</strong> The result of the discussion will be posted soon.
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 <!---Please type in whether you accept or decline this nomination above this line-->
 ====Support Deadminship====
+#
-#'''Support''' - remarks like [http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bluegoblin7&curid=196052&diff=2311082&oldid=2311069 this] imply he holds personal vendettas above the procedure of the wiki. Also, as many new users look up to administrators as examples, I believe that calling other editors names such as those used [http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bluegoblin7&diff=prev&oldid=2311069 here] sets a very poor example, and I ask for better behavior from an administrator. [[User:Kansan|Kansan]] ([[User talk:Kansan|talk]]) 18:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
-#Per Kansan, per his history, and per NVS. This is unacceptable behaviour from an admin. [[User:Griffinofwales|Griffinofwales]] ([[User talk:Griffinofwales|talk]]) 18:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
-#Whether he meant it or not (and I hope not) he told me (via IRC, logs available) he is going rogue and indicated he would now become a vandal. '''''[[User:Fr33kman|<font color="darkgreen">fr33k</font>]][[User talk:Fr33kman|<font color="blue">man</font>]]''''' 19:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 ====Oppose Deadminship====